Bradford Council to amend policy on covert surveillance (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
Bradford Council to amend policy on covert surveillance
6:00am Friday 22nd March 2013 in News
By Rhys Thomas, T&A Reporter
Bradford Council is to amend its surveillance policy
Bradford Council is to amend its policy on surveillance in light of new Government guidelines.
Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA), the authority must now apply for approval from magistrates if it wishes to carry out covert surveillance operations.
Its policy must also clarify where surveillance can be used, said Councillor Lynne Smith, chairman of the Corporate Governance and Audit Committee. She said the changes made to Council policy would only be minor because the authority follows surveillance rules strictly.
Coun Smith said: “We are amending our policy to reflect the Government guidelines that have been issued, although the changes we are making are very, very minor. For us, in practice, the changes will not make any difference. Our practice is very much in line with the rules anyway. The only change for us is the getting permission from magistrates.
“In terms of the steps before that, we already have very tight restrictions on surveillance.”
The committee is meeting today to discuss the Government changes to RIPA. A report to the committee recommends that “the Council’s policy relating to RIPA be amended to note the serious offence test applies to only directed surveillance from November 1 2012”.
The serious offence test means that directed surveillance can only be carried out in connection with investigations into offences that would lead to six months or more in prison. The two exceptions to that rule are the sale of cigarettes and alcohol to children.
Coun Smith said: “The Government has brought in the new guidelines because there has been controversy where councils have used surveillance in the wrong way, such as catching people who let their dogs foul.
“It needs to be amended because we need to do so to comply with the guidelines, but we don’t need to change much.” A report last August told of a need to overhaul the RIPA legislation, highlighting councils which used the powers to catch dog owners whose pets fouled the streets and to investigate breaches of the smoking ban.
Campaign group Big Brother Watch said local councils had carried out more than 9,000 surveillance operations over a three-year period.
Coun Smith said it was the opposite for Bradford Council.
She said: “We have not used any covert surveillance for more than three years. We always believe that covert surveillance needs to be used only as a last resort and in serious instances.”
The new guidelines were introduced in November, but Coun Smith said: “There is usually a period of grace for councils to catch up.”
Comments(4)
ANY WHERE BUT HERE
says...
7:09pm Fri 22 Mar 13
RollandSmoke
says...
9:30pm Fri 22 Mar 13
ANY WHERE BUT HERE wrote:What you mean the measures brought in after Peter Powers ran his terror excersise on 7/7 for an unknown client with more or less the same scenario that was described on Panorama the year before by himself and Micheal Portillo, and where the police shot "suspected terrorists" at Canary Warf? I blame Saddam Hussain and his WMDs
Those counter terrorism measures brought in by Labour. Made sure you were sending your children to the right school. Very very scary.
Not so simple
says...
3:31pm Sun 24 Mar 13
Social landlords as the big ones we have in the City also use RIPA through various direct and indirect surveillance....it would be interesting to know exactly who authorises such actions from within these firms and based upon which reliable source of credible evidence. These landlords are run by the same people who had the Jobs under the control of the council....these stinky rats get about and stay under the radar whilst deflecting criticism.
Intelligence is used by the police and courts derived from persons informing the housing associations about trouble some residents.....I must point out to you that some of these informants have the potential to generally use the narrow minded ness of the staff who are just bothered about their 9-5 jobs and pensions, to play out their own agendas against persons they don't like or approve of on the estates.
I'll give you an example how it works;
The housing providers have enforcement departments. These departments are fed info from tenants ( who remain anonymous) via the local housing officer. The information is deemed to be correct as it is fed via the tenants to the housing officer who in turn passes it onto the enforcement dept who then works with the police, social services and other agencies to deal with the issue....this is open to potential abuse. The cheif execs of these housing providers then can within RIPA authorise CCTV and spying at the alledged trouble makers. Occasionally the CCTV and spying is not needed as they, the enforcement dept and police may rely on the witness statements that have already been handed to them via the housing office.
Basically the entire system is open to abuse.
I would also question the integrity, honesty and transparency of the housing officers, witnesses, police officers and the cheif execs who authorise the CCTV etc.
RollandSmoke says...
4:01pm Fri 22 Mar 13