Bradford Council to review homes permission

Bradford Council is to look again at two controversial housing plans after changes to national planning guidance and new evidence of flooding.

The authority has confirmed councillors are to reconsider schemes for more than 300 new homes in Menston. The plans are expected to go before the next available meeting of the Council’s Regulatory and Appeals Committee.

The Council’s Shipley Area Planning Panel granted conditional approval in February 2012 for the developments, at Bingley Road and Derry Hill.

Solicitors instructed by Menston Action Group (MAG) wrote to Bradford Council earlier this month saying the Council was obliged to review its decision and refer the applications back to its committee for re-determination.

Solicitors Schofield Sweeney told the Council: “If the Council do not take a further decision in the light of a material change then this would be an administrative failure which would be capable of Judicial Review.”

Three “highly material” developments included the publication of the National Planning Policy Framework, the abolition of the Regional Spatial Strategy, and flooding on the sites in July, August and September last year.

Dr Steve Ellams, of MAG, said: “We feel we have got a genuine reason here to prevent these developments going ahead.”

Both sites were removed from the green belt and designated as potential housing land less than a decade ago.

Councillor Val Slater, the Council’s executive member for planning, said the schemes would be returning to the Regulatory and Appeals Committee.

“We have taken our own legal advice and decided to refer it back to avoid any costly cases,” she said.

Julian Jackson, Bradford Council's assistant director for planning, said: “The Council has taken the decision to refer the Derry Hill and Bingley Road planning applications to the Regulatory and Appeals Committee to avoid what could be a lengthy and costly court case brought by several objectors to those schemes.

“The objectors believe that there are some matters that have occurred since the planning panel decision in February 2012, including publication of the National Planning Policy Framework which require the applications to be reconsidered by the Council.

“The Council, while it does not necessarily agree with the objectors on this, believes that it is prudent to refer the applications back to the committee so that members can consider what has happened since February 2012.”

l A planning inquiry over the non-determination of planning conditions for the 135-home Bingley Road scheme is to be held at Kirklands Community Centre, Main Street, Menston, starting on Tuesday, April 9.

e-mail: chris.tate @telegraphandargus.co.uk

Comments(4)

Not so simple says...
7:09pm Thu 14 Mar 13

(place the bradford tinted shades on the desk prior to reading or contributing)


I wouldn't trust Bradford Council to make a decent decision even if their lives depended on it.

Failure is the bloom for the doom and gloom councillors.

Examples of failure are;

Odeon

Broadway

Odsal stadium reclining roof

Privatisation of its housing stock to a company currently known as Incommunities

List goes on

Open invitation to all;

Add to the list at your leisure...my fingers will get tired and I need more then a week to write about the failings.

chainbaar says...
10:37pm Thu 14 Mar 13

10,000 empty houses.

Hundreds of derelict sites.

Westfield saga.

City Centre wastelands.

Development plan not fit for purpose.

Duck pond for the Councillors.

Failure to consult.

Failure to listen.

Failure to show respect.

Failure to implement even basic urban regeneration strategies.

Building on greenfield sites instead of brownfield sites.

Section 106 money for nothing.

The Council planning dept dont care about Bradford or its villages because they dont live there.
They will do whatever the developers tell them to do as long as they rake in the s106 money. The objectors are seen as a mere inconvenience, even if they do have a point, it matters not to the planners, they will try to airbrush it away as usual.

Not so simple says...
2:07am Fri 15 Mar 13

chainbaar wrote:
10,000 empty houses.

Hundreds of derelict sites.

Westfield saga.

City Centre wastelands.

Development plan not fit for purpose.

Duck pond for the Councillors.

Failure to consult.

Failure to listen.

Failure to show respect.

Failure to implement even basic urban regeneration strategies.

Building on greenfield sites instead of brownfield sites.

Section 106 money for nothing.

The Council planning dept dont care about Bradford or its villages because they dont live there.
They will do whatever the developers tell them to do as long as they rake in the s106 money. The objectors are seen as a mere inconvenience, even if they do have a point, it matters not to the planners, they will try to airbrush it away as usual.
...proper background checks on councillors, re the cllr Imdad fiasco.

Bus lanes down busy roads creating further traffic congestion by narrowing busy roads.

Cameras all over town that cannot take what I'd consider are clear photos or videos.

However the bus lane cameras seem to work fine!

Biggest game in our football clubs recent history and the council failed to provide city centre entertainment for the big match, ie big screens.

Council giving "loans" to businesses as reported recently in the paper.

Fingers hurting again...one could write a book or two

mad matt says...
6:58am Fri 15 Mar 13

Duck pond for the councillors?


More like a shopping trolley wash!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree