130 cars seized by police in crime crackdown face the crusher (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)

bennyG wrote:
You really expect a few crushed uninsured cars to make a difference to premiums?

Come back down to the real world. Insurance companies themselves should wear black and white striped jumpers.

collos25 wrote:
Not very good whan you consider the area and the time ,a simple walk found parts of Bradford will get that many motor cars in a day.Token gesture by a undermanned confused police force.

Truth77 wrote:
Why destroy them all?
There must be some that are able to be used by the police and various agency's instead of the taxpayer buying vehicles all the time. Some of them are reported as luxury cars and these should be either used or checked over and sent to auction to again raise money.

Bradford_Muslim wrote:
BRAVO to the police force, this is exactly what Bradford needs, next stop..... STOP MOBILITY, sick of these people posing with fancy cars

i hate bradford wrote:

Bradford_Muslim wrote:
BRAVO to the police force, this is exactly what Bradford needs, next stop..... STOP MOBILITY, sick of these people posing with fancy cars

Are you inferring disabled people who can't walk and so qualify for a mobility car are the same type of person as the drug dealing, illegal car driving, firearms owning violent criminals?

Go get an education you ignorant hater of disabled people. You sound so jealous and very very stupid too.

Bradford and Proud.....? wrote:

collos25 wrote:
Not very good whan you consider the area and the time ,a simple walk found parts of Bradford will get that many motor cars in a day.Token gesture by a undermanned confused police force.

Are you for real? 130 cars in 2 weeks is 10 per day. What do you expect to happen when the police find them? Call a Genie and make it disappear before moving onto the next one? Or perhaps issue a ticket and leave it on the screen, in which case you could ridicule them for not taking the vehicles and making it a pointless exercise. How many times have you called Crimestoppers to help the police out? No, didnt think so!

Bradford and Proud.....? wrote:

collos25 wrote:
Not very good whan you consider the area and the time ,a simple walk found parts of Bradford will get that many motor cars in a day.Token gesture by a undermanned confused police force.

Are you for real? 130 cars in 2 weeks is 10 per day. What do you expect to happen when the police find them? Call a Genie and make it disappear before moving onto the next one? Or perhaps issue a ticket and leave it on the screen, in which case you could ridicule them for not taking the vehicles and making it a pointless exercise. How many times have you called Crimestoppers to help the police out? No, didnt think so!

Not so simple wrote:
Why are the police or the police commissioner chap not pressing for these cars to be sold or even exported to raise funds for the local authority, police force and charities? Saves em sacking 2000 people.

End of the day the Police have a common law duty to protect the public...they serve us and work for us.

They should pay attention when the "bosses" say sell the cars and use the money as directed by your "bosses". We the public are your bosses.

Seems rather daft that these vehicles are crushed.

Secondly the vehicles are only able to be crushed or taken off the "keeper" as the DVLA actually own all registered vehicles...DvLA via logbook and drivers licensze make a contract with the keeper to drive it around and pay the fines and taxes. This is a scam in itself.

Re the insurance falling? Are you guys on drugs? Insurance is also a scam to force one to pay to have free passage on the land....this goes directly against the UN charter on Human rights...freedom to travel.

Insurance and insurance companies operate a cartel of fixed premiums where they force people to pay huge,unjustified premiums to be able to travel privately around the land. For commerce or business purposes one requires insurance, however for private travel one doesn't require insurance and the police cannot enforce the will of a company over a human being living under common law.

collos25 wrote:

Bradford and Proud.....? wrote:

collos25 wrote:
Not very good whan you consider the area and the time ,a simple walk found parts of Bradford will get that many motor cars in a day.Token gesture by a undermanned confused police force.

Are you for real? 130 cars in 2 weeks is 10 per day. What do you expect to happen when the police find them? Call a Genie and make it disappear before moving onto the next one? Or perhaps issue a ticket and leave it on the screen, in which case you could ridicule them for not taking the vehicles and making it a pointless exercise. How many times have you called Crimestoppers to help the police out? No, didnt think so!

Read the article properly numbskull its not in two weeks its in 13months.

Andy2010 wrote:

Not so simple wrote:
Why are the police or the police commissioner chap not pressing for these cars to be sold or even exported to raise funds for the local authority, police force and charities? Saves em sacking 2000 people.

End of the day the Police have a common law duty to protect the public...they serve us and work for us.

They should pay attention when the "bosses" say sell the cars and use the money as directed by your "bosses". We the public are your bosses.

Seems rather daft that these vehicles are crushed.

Secondly the vehicles are only able to be crushed or taken off the "keeper" as the DVLA actually own all registered vehicles...DvLA via logbook and drivers licensze make a contract with the keeper to drive it around and pay the fines and taxes. This is a scam in itself.

Re the insurance falling? Are you guys on drugs? Insurance is also a scam to force one to pay to have free passage on the land....this goes directly against the UN charter on Human rights...freedom to travel.

Insurance and insurance companies operate a cartel of fixed premiums where they force people to pay huge,unjustified premiums to be able to travel privately around the land. For commerce or business purposes one requires insurance, however for private travel one doesn't require insurance and the police cannot enforce the will of a company over a human being living under common law.

LOL ....Take it you dont have insurance then and are willing to defend not having any on the basis of the above

Laughable

tyker2 wrote:

Andy2010 wrote:

Not so simple wrote:
Why are the police or the police commissioner chap not pressing for these cars to be sold or even exported to raise funds for the local authority, police force and charities? Saves em sacking 2000 people.

End of the day the Police have a common law duty to protect the public...they serve us and work for us.

They should pay attention when the "bosses" say sell the cars and use the money as directed by your "bosses". We the public are your bosses.

Seems rather daft that these vehicles are crushed.

Secondly the vehicles are only able to be crushed or taken off the "keeper" as the DVLA actually own all registered vehicles...DvLA via logbook and drivers licensze make a contract with the keeper to drive it around and pay the fines and taxes. This is a scam in itself.

Re the insurance falling? Are you guys on drugs? Insurance is also a scam to force one to pay to have free passage on the land....this goes directly against the UN charter on Human rights...freedom to travel.

Insurance and insurance companies operate a cartel of fixed premiums where they force people to pay huge,unjustified premiums to be able to travel privately around the land. For commerce or business purposes one requires insurance, however for private travel one doesn't require insurance and the police cannot enforce the will of a company over a human being living under common law.

LOL ....Take it you dont have insurance then and are willing to defend not having any on the basis of the above

Laughable

not so simple:stupid idiotic comments. bet you hate the state but love the benefits all people living with the law provide through taxes etc

Albion. wrote:

collos25 wrote:

Bradford and Proud.....? wrote:

collos25 wrote:
Not very good whan you consider the area and the time ,a simple walk found parts of Bradford will get that many motor cars in a day.Token gesture by a undermanned confused police force.

Are you for real? 130 cars in 2 weeks is 10 per day. What do you expect to happen when the police find them? Call a Genie and make it disappear before moving onto the next one? Or perhaps issue a ticket and leave it on the screen, in which case you could ridicule them for not taking the vehicles and making it a pointless exercise. How many times have you called Crimestoppers to help the police out? No, didnt think so!

Read the article properly numbskull its not in two weeks its in 13months.

"In the latest two-week blitz in early February, more than 130 vehicles were confiscated when they were found to be unregistered, uninsured, or without tax or MoTs."
Erm?

Andy2010 wrote:

Not so simple wrote:
Why are the police or the police commissioner chap not pressing for these cars to be sold or even exported to raise funds for the local authority, police force and charities? Saves em sacking 2000 people.

End of the day the Police have a common law duty to protect the public...they serve us and work for us.

They should pay attention when the "bosses" say sell the cars and use the money as directed by your "bosses". We the public are your bosses.

Seems rather daft that these vehicles are crushed.

Secondly the vehicles are only able to be crushed or taken off the "keeper" as the DVLA actually own all registered vehicles...DvLA via logbook and drivers licensze make a contract with the keeper to drive it around and pay the fines and taxes. This is a scam in itself.

Re the insurance falling? Are you guys on drugs? Insurance is also a scam to force one to pay to have free passage on the land....this goes directly against the UN charter on Human rights...freedom to travel.

Insurance and insurance companies operate a cartel of fixed premiums where they force people to pay huge,unjustified premiums to be able to travel privately around the land. For commerce or business purposes one requires insurance, however for private travel one doesn't require insurance and the police cannot enforce the will of a company over a human being living under common law.

LOL ....Take it you dont have insurance then and are willing to defend not having any on the basis of the above

Laughable

Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:

tyker2 wrote:

Andy2010 wrote:

Not so simple wrote:
Why are the police or the police commissioner chap not pressing for these cars to be sold or even exported to raise funds for the local authority, police force and charities? Saves em sacking 2000 people.

End of the day the Police have a common law duty to protect the public...they serve us and work for us.

They should pay attention when the "bosses" say sell the cars and use the money as directed by your "bosses". We the public are your bosses.

Seems rather daft that these vehicles are crushed.

Secondly the vehicles are only able to be crushed or taken off the "keeper" as the DVLA actually own all registered vehicles...DvLA via logbook and drivers licensze make a contract with the keeper to drive it around and pay the fines and taxes. This is a scam in itself.

Re the insurance falling? Are you guys on drugs? Insurance is also a scam to force one to pay to have free passage on the land....this goes directly against the UN charter on Human rights...freedom to travel.

Insurance and insurance companies operate a cartel of fixed premiums where they force people to pay huge,unjustified premiums to be able to travel privately around the land. For commerce or business purposes one requires insurance, however for private travel one doesn't require insurance and the police cannot enforce the will of a company over a human being living under common law.

LOL ....Take it you dont have insurance then and are willing to defend not having any on the basis of the above

Laughable

not so simple:stupid idiotic comments. bet you hate the state but love the benefits all people living with the law provide through taxes etc

Don't be so quick to judge and jump to the conclusions you have.

not so simple explained previously about entering into a civil contract with the government, section 61 plus others of the Magna Carta and other little gems.

Before dismissing off hand his comments, engage him and ask for further explanation. You may learn something or he may be talking total codswallop, we are basically sheep doing as we are told because our parents did, their parents did etc etc

collos25 wrote:
Secondly the vehicles are only able to be crushed or taken off the "keeper" as the DVLA actually own all registered vehicles...DvLA via logbook and drivers licensze make a contract with the keeper to drive it around and pay the fines and taxes. This is a scam in itself.

Where on earth did you get that info from a noddy book.The DVLA own the registration plate and log book not the car that is owned by the owner not the name in the log book.The owner owns it full stop could be a HP company or anybody.You do not need insurance for anything but you must be able to prove beyond all doubt that you have assetts that will cover all claims that could amount to a few million pounds and seeing that you cannot tax a vehicle without insurance or MOT it seems that you need insurance to drive a vehicle doesn´t it.

baccy2410 wrote:
Couldn't they be sold off and monies credited to victim support or such like?

Not so simple wrote:

Andy2010 wrote:

Not so simple wrote:
Why are the police or the police commissioner chap not pressing for these cars to be sold or even exported to raise funds for the local authority, police force and charities? Saves em sacking 2000 people.

End of the day the Police have a common law duty to protect the public...they serve us and work for us.

They should pay attention when the "bosses" say sell the cars and use the money as directed by your "bosses". We the public are your bosses.

Seems rather daft that these vehicles are crushed.

Secondly the vehicles are only able to be crushed or taken off the "keeper" as the DVLA actually own all registered vehicles...DvLA via logbook and drivers licensze make a contract with the keeper to drive it around and pay the fines and taxes. This is a scam in itself.

Re the insurance falling? Are you guys on drugs? Insurance is also a scam to force one to pay to have free passage on the land....this goes directly against the UN charter on Human rights...freedom to travel.

Insurance and insurance companies operate a cartel of fixed premiums where they force people to pay huge,unjustified premiums to be able to travel privately around the land. For commerce or business purposes one requires insurance, however for private travel one doesn't require insurance and the police cannot enforce the will of a company over a human being living under common law.

LOL ....Take it you dont have insurance then and are willing to defend not having any on the basis of the above

Laughable

Do not dismiss things without first studying and understanding what I am saying.

I am legally qualified, pay my taxes and relative insurances. Not your average Bradfordian as I am not one to not ask questions and blindly follow the leaders.

Do you know what is the law of the land?

Do you know what common law is?

I Understand common law, Do you?

Common law is the law of the land...other "laws" are Acts or Statutes. For the latter to apply to you one needs to consent to it.

Most legally qualified sheep do not understand these concepts as they rea and repeat to obtain their legal qualifications.

If this doesn't make sense to your dismissive brains then I suggest you have look at the link below.

Watch this on you tube to enlighten your rather dim but simple view on reality

http://www.google.co

.uk/url?sa=t&rct
=j&q
=freeman%20on%20the%

20land%20a%20carpent

ers&source=web&a
mp;cd=1&
ved=0CDIQtwIwAA&
url=
http%3A%2F%2Fwww.you

tube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv

%3DpvdCFWWkDTA&e
i=4s
QwUYqGPOGI4ATo94Ew&a
mp;u
sg=AFQjCNEqIqLbeLSUa

mgwlhWYZlwr248QIQ&am
p;bv
m=bv.43148975,d.bGE


If you cannot copy and paste then google

"freeman on the land, a carpenters view"

This is just the tip of the iceberg...not of the lettuce variety.

georget wrote:
Well sell them at auction, ??
& who will be buying them back for a song, THE CROOKS WHO HAD THEM BEFORE
To Reiterate, Do you think thats a good idea??
Crush Them ALL The Crooks aswell Locked inside them
Then Sieze ALL their Assets, Millions, & use that to Get more Police On the job
We know where these Crooks come from Dont we?
DEPORT THE LOT, No Questions Asked THEY ARE THE TERRORIST Againt this country””

georget wrote:
Andy2010 Anything else you may of Observed
Typical, Numpty, Your supposed to read the comments not offer Abuse
My caps lock is fine, Just worry about youself, And remarks on the Cars, Druggies Cops Etc
Unless you are one of them weedies

Andy2010 wrote:

georget wrote:
Andy2010 Anything else you may of Observed
Typical, Numpty, Your supposed to read the comments not offer Abuse
My caps lock is fine, Just worry about youself, And remarks on the Cars, Druggies Cops Etc
Unless you are one of them weedies

What's a weedie?

Anyway I actually agree with everything you said. I was merely worried about the condition of your keyboard.

georget wrote:
Andy2010 Anything else you may of Observed
Typical, Numpty, Your supposed to read the comments not offer Abuse
My caps lock is fine, Just worry about youself, And remarks on the Cars, Druggies Cops Etc
Unless you are one of them weedies

georget wrote:
So you smoke the weedie

Is cannabis harmful?

Answer:

Yes. It deteriorates your mind. You may lose your long term memory, and like all things that you smoke it isn't that great for your lungs either.
Cannabis contains 20 times more ammonia, and five times more hydrogen cyanide and nitrous oxides than tobacco smoke. It also may have an effect of preventing cancer from spreading for a time, as it kills cells.( This is all the result of tests done by the Canadian government) Like the ones you need for your longterm memory, but also the cancer infected cells in your lungs. The only downside is that you have to face the fact that the chance for a regular smoker of cannabis to get lung cancer is more likely. The search results say that this is due to the fact that they hold the smoke in longer, and that there is more smoke. They say marijuana uses tend to develop lung cancer up to 24 years before the average smoker. Of course the results could change depending on the amount you smoke versus that of a regular smoker. The point I am trying to make is that yes there are people out there like parentsagainstmariju

ana who will give you false facts but in short YES it is bad for your health. Just because it may or may not be as bad a cigarettes doesn't mean it's not bad. Marijuana is a psychoactive. It alters the way you perceive things.










Rate This Answer

i hate bradford wrote:

Bradford_Muslim wrote:
BRAVO to the police force, this is exactly what Bradford needs, next stop..... STOP MOBILITY, sick of these people posing with fancy cars

Are you inferring disabled people who can't walk and so qualify for a mobility car are the same type of person as the drug dealing, illegal car driving, firearms owning violent criminals?

Go get an education you ignorant hater of disabled people. You sound so jealous and very very stupid too.

georget wrote:
Smoking cannabis Re macdonalds
Macdonalds In England is totaly crap, ****
Go to Germany & see Macdonalds there twice as big, double the thickness Juicy & Not like here, CARDBOARD

Not so simple wrote:

Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:

tyker2 wrote:

Andy2010 wrote:

Not so simple wrote:
Why are the police or the police commissioner chap not pressing for these cars to be sold or even exported to raise funds for the local authority, police force and charities? Saves em sacking 2000 people.

End of the day the Police have a common law duty to protect the public...they serve us and work for us.

They should pay attention when the "bosses" say sell the cars and use the money as directed by your "bosses". We the public are your bosses.

Seems rather daft that these vehicles are crushed.

Secondly the vehicles are only able to be crushed or taken off the "keeper" as the DVLA actually own all registered vehicles...DvLA via logbook and drivers licensze make a contract with the keeper to drive it around and pay the fines and taxes. This is a scam in itself.

Re the insurance falling? Are you guys on drugs? Insurance is also a scam to force one to pay to have free passage on the land....this goes directly against the UN charter on Human rights...freedom to travel.

Insurance and insurance companies operate a cartel of fixed premiums where they force people to pay huge,unjustified premiums to be able to travel privately around the land. For commerce or business purposes one requires insurance, however for private travel one doesn't require insurance and the police cannot enforce the will of a company over a human being living under common law.

LOL ....Take it you dont have insurance then and are willing to defend not having any on the basis of the above

Laughable

not so simple:stupid idiotic comments. bet you hate the state but love the benefits all people living with the law provide through taxes etc

Don't be so quick to judge and jump to the conclusions you have.

not so simple explained previously about entering into a civil contract with the government, section 61 plus others of the Magna Carta and other little gems.

Before dismissing off hand his comments, engage him and ask for further explanation. You may learn something or he may be talking total codswallop, we are basically sheep doing as we are told because our parents did, their parents did etc etc

Prisoner, Sir I take off my hat to you as you are willing to understand and more importantly "think" for yourself. Respect.

It's such a shame that people do not bother to research or understand a point in law, rather they just dismiss it akin to an uncivilised society.

For a quick one stop explanation I suggest all to watch the links in my previous comment above

GlobalSingh wrote:
What Bradford needs are more Police Officers on the beat and more 'no-nonsense' tough Officers who can deter criminals by their sheer presence as well as catch them...Education is not an option with hardened, macho,dogmatised, egomaniacs who need an old fashioned 'clip round the ear hole' by a 6'-6'' Officer! to embarrass them and dent their egos.

tyker2 wrote:

Not so simple wrote:

Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:

tyker2 wrote:

Andy2010 wrote:

Not so simple wrote:
Why are the police or the police commissioner chap not pressing for these cars to be sold or even exported to raise funds for the local authority, police force and charities? Saves em sacking 2000 people.

End of the day the Police have a common law duty to protect the public...they serve us and work for us.

They should pay attention when the "bosses" say sell the cars and use the money as directed by your "bosses". We the public are your bosses.

Seems rather daft that these vehicles are crushed.

Secondly the vehicles are only able to be crushed or taken off the "keeper" as the DVLA actually own all registered vehicles...DvLA via logbook and drivers licensze make a contract with the keeper to drive it around and pay the fines and taxes. This is a scam in itself.

Re the insurance falling? Are you guys on drugs? Insurance is also a scam to force one to pay to have free passage on the land....this goes directly against the UN charter on Human rights...freedom to travel.

Insurance and insurance companies operate a cartel of fixed premiums where they force people to pay huge,unjustified premiums to be able to travel privately around the land. For commerce or business purposes one requires insurance, however for private travel one doesn't require insurance and the police cannot enforce the will of a company over a human being living under common law.

LOL ....Take it you dont have insurance then and are willing to defend not having any on the basis of the above

Laughable

not so simple:stupid idiotic comments. bet you hate the state but love the benefits all people living with the law provide through taxes etc

Don't be so quick to judge and jump to the conclusions you have.

not so simple explained previously about entering into a civil contract with the government, section 61 plus others of the Magna Carta and other little gems.

Before dismissing off hand his comments, engage him and ask for further explanation. You may learn something or he may be talking total codswallop, we are basically sheep doing as we are told because our parents did, their parents did etc etc

Prisoner, Sir I take off my hat to you as you are willing to understand and more importantly "think" for yourself. Respect.

It's such a shame that people do not bother to research or understand a point in law, rather they just dismiss it akin to an uncivilised society.

For a quick one stop explanation I suggest all to watch the links in my previous comment above

test it all in Court and see where you get. Please do not claim for funds from the public purse to do it

tyker2 wrote:

Not so simple wrote:

Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:

tyker2 wrote:

Andy2010 wrote:

Not so simple wrote:
Why are the police or the police commissioner chap not pressing for these cars to be sold or even exported to raise funds for the local authority, police force and charities? Saves em sacking 2000 people.

End of the day the Police have a common law duty to protect the public...they serve us and work for us.

They should pay attention when the "bosses" say sell the cars and use the money as directed by your "bosses". We the public are your bosses.

Seems rather daft that these vehicles are crushed.

Secondly the vehicles are only able to be crushed or taken off the "keeper" as the DVLA actually own all registered vehicles...DvLA via logbook and drivers licensze make a contract with the keeper to drive it around and pay the fines and taxes. This is a scam in itself.

Re the insurance falling? Are you guys on drugs? Insurance is also a scam to force one to pay to have free passage on the land....this goes directly against the UN charter on Human rights...freedom to travel.

Insurance and insurance companies operate a cartel of fixed premiums where they force people to pay huge,unjustified premiums to be able to travel privately around the land. For commerce or business purposes one requires insurance, however for private travel one doesn't require insurance and the police cannot enforce the will of a company over a human being living under common law.

LOL ....Take it you dont have insurance then and are willing to defend not having any on the basis of the above

Laughable

not so simple:stupid idiotic comments. bet you hate the state but love the benefits all people living with the law provide through taxes etc

Don't be so quick to judge and jump to the conclusions you have.

not so simple explained previously about entering into a civil contract with the government, section 61 plus others of the Magna Carta and other little gems.

Before dismissing off hand his comments, engage him and ask for further explanation. You may learn something or he may be talking total codswallop, we are basically sheep doing as we are told because our parents did, their parents did etc etc

Prisoner, Sir I take off my hat to you as you are willing to understand and more importantly "think" for yourself. Respect.

It's such a shame that people do not bother to research or understand a point in law, rather they just dismiss it akin to an uncivilised society.

For a quick one stop explanation I suggest all to watch the links in my previous comment above

test it all in Court and see where you get. Please do not claim for funds from the public purse to do it

Bradford and Proud.....? wrote:
Not so simple - specific police powers are set out under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, which is an Act of Parliament, not common law. Their common law powers are the same as yours and mine - right to defend property, prevent a breach of the peace etc, but police specific powers are contained in the above Act. Also, we are not their bosses - they hold an office of constable, meaning they are crown servants and not employees. Their duty to serve is first and foremost to the Queen, and the inference from Sir Robert Peel's founding principles that the police are simply members of the community who are paid to undertake the duties bound on all of us.

In summary - the problems with Bradford are not down to the police alone but each and every one of us for allowing things to get this bad.

i hate bradford wrote:

Bradford_Muslim wrote:
BRAVO to the police force, this is exactly what Bradford needs, next stop..... STOP MOBILITY, sick of these people posing with fancy cars

Are you inferring disabled people who can't walk and so qualify for a mobility car are the same type of person as the drug dealing, illegal car driving, firearms owning violent criminals?

Go get an education you ignorant hater of disabled people. You sound so jealous and very very stupid too.

Bradford and Proud.....? wrote:
There was the Police Act in the 60s, before that numerous iterations of the Metropolitan Police Act (since the 1800s). Before that it was a mixture of Parish officials and the army.

All of which were set in statute.

Not so simple wrote:

Bradford and Proud.....? wrote:
There was the Police Act in the 60s, before that numerous iterations of the Metropolitan Police Act (since the 1800s). Before that it was a mixture of Parish officials and the army.

All of which were set in statute.

You still do not understand what common law is! What us wrong with you man. Ask any lawyer, any judge and any police constable to tell you whatthe common law is. Ask them to remind you what type of law rules over the land known as England...common law. Ask them what type of law rules over the corporation known as the UK and you will be suprised.

It appears you have limited your ability to think. You only appear to follow what the leal proffesion or institutions tell you in their books and propagnda.

Have a look at the actual legal status of each force...you will find it is setup and trades as a limited company.

Have a look at the UK as a whole and you will note that all legal,public institutions are setup as limited companies.

Since when do voters vote for limited companies.

Have a look at the UK and you will see it is a company, just like the City of London...all this came about after the fire of London when ownership was disputed and many rightful owners who'd died had their land confiscated by the limited government.

You need to understand that the constitution does not allow for companies to rule us!

A company is a legal entity. Humans are flesh and blood living souls...not legal companies that can be ruled by legal entities aka companies.

You are missing the point entirely. Try reading and understanding what the Magna Carta, Bill of Rights , our written and unwritten Constituiton really is.....and how the companies and institutions using their influence have manipulated and ignored our fundamental rights.

Of course you won't read and will continue to assume things. Good luck sheep.