Tax hike on fizzy drinks 'unfair on poor' say Bradford MPs

Doctors are aiming to tackle Britain's obesity crisis Doctors are aiming to tackle Britain's obesity crisis

Calls for a 20 per cent hike in the cost of sugary drinks to tackle Britain’s obesity crisis drew strong criticism from some Bradford MPs last night.

Both Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs said the proposal, put forward by doctors, was an unfair attack on individual choice and would hit the poor.

But Labour’s Gerry Sutcliffe backed the move, pointing out that it mirrored his party’s plan and was essential to cut the ballooning cost of obesity to the NHS.

The MPs spoke out after The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges demanded action from the Government, the NHS, local councils, food firms and parents.

It warned of the desperate need to break the cycle of “generation after generation falling victim to obesity-related illnesses and death”.

One in four adults in England is obese, with the figures predicted to rise to 60 per cent of men, 50 per cent of women and 25 per cent of children by 2050.

The central recommendation in a ten-point action plan was a 20 per cent tax on sugary soft drinks, with the £1bn raised spent on weight management programmes.

But Philip Davies, the Tory MP for Shipley, said: “I don’t agree with finding more and more imaginative ways to increase taxes on people who are struggling with the extortionate cost of living.

“You start off with fizzy drinks, then it will be fish and chips, then curries, then pizza and, before you know it, virtually everything will be taxed.

“I think we should give people the information so they can make their own minds up about what to eat and drink. It’s their lives and that’s a decision for them to take.”

That criticism was echoed by David Ward, Liberal Democrat MP for Bradford East, who said: “I don’t agree with this. It smacks of the nanny state.

“Once you go down this road, you end up in a difficult place where the next thing might be charging people who end up at A&E with alcohol in their bloodstream.

“Or perhaps people who are overweight won’t receive equal treatment in the NHS? Or people who won’t quit smoking?

“I think the answer to this problem – and it is a big problem – is good parenting and better education, rather than increasing tax, which will hit poor people rather than the better-off.”

But Mr Sutcliffe, the Bradford South MP, said: “Labour raised this issue a month ago, because we all have to be concerned about the obesity problem.

“It is matter of choice and we would need to look at the detail of the proposal, but I think people will respond to attempts to push them towards healthier eating.”

Mr Sutcliffe accepted there was a danger of a sugar tax hitting the poor harder, but he added: “We would need to work with the industry to see what could be done about that.”

The report also called for limits on fast food outlets near schools, more bariatric surgery, better food in hospitals and a ban on TV advertisements for fatty foods before the 9pm watershed.

Comments(7)

collos25 says...
9:26am Tue 19 Feb 13

It will hit the poor a lot more if they are in hospital ill,if somebody proved to me a food or drink was harmful then I would not drink or eat it.Is the price of tobacco a drain on the poor or a health benifit. I really think MPs should think things through before they open their mouths.

Hockens Hey says...
9:53am Tue 19 Feb 13

Perhaps the NHS should get its own house in order before lecturing the rest of us on what we should and shouldn't eat, drink or smoke.
.
Judging by what's come to light recently, the NHS has killed far more people than sugar ever has or will.

Joedavid says...
10:10am Tue 19 Feb 13

Hockens Hey wrote:
Perhaps the NHS should get its own house in order before lecturing the rest of us on what we should and shouldn't eat, drink or smoke.
.
Judging by what's come to light recently, the NHS has killed far more people than sugar ever has or will.
Some NHS staff need to get their weight right too.
I hope none of them smoke and drink too much too.

ertnec says...
11:02am Tue 19 Feb 13

Why oh Why are we again telling people what their can do and what to buy, we are not bloody robots and have our own thoughts. We all know what is good and what is bad for you, please give us the choice to decide. I dont think we can blame others fizzy drink, fast food etc We need to educate parents and to show children what good food can be if parents could afford it

johnhem says...
11:50am Tue 19 Feb 13

this makes my blood boil. something that is'nt good for you has to be taxed? why? will making it more expensive and heavily taxed improve its flavour and reduce the sugar content? will taxing it make it suddenly acceptable?
make it taste bad, or sour instead of sweet.
figures just for example.... a can of fizzy pop is £1, taxed at 10% makes it £1.10. the 10p tax times the ten cans sold a day = £1 taken in taxes...... so my question is who gets the tax money and what does it do to combat the problem?

johnhem says...
9:02pm Tue 19 Feb 13

raise £1b to use as weight management programmes? yeah right. chuck a few grand at it to make it look as if somethings being done....... then send the other £9.95mil off in foreign aid. or some outreach outareach workshop. its ok for them to stick their big fat noses in the trough, how about giving us a choice how we live.

thelastmanstanding says...
9:46pm Tue 19 Feb 13

Taxing us to save us from ourselves... Fancy that.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree