‘Have your say’ over care cuts

Vulnerable and elderly people who could see their home help cut as Bradford Council tries to make savings are being warned they must get their stories heard to influence a consultation about the service.

Keith Nathan, the chief executive of Bradford and District Age UK charity, said he wants to hear from those currently receiving the Fair Access to Care (FACS) service who could lose out under Council changes aimed at saving £1.57 million a year.

Bradford Council is launching a public consultation asking people if the FACS guidelines should be moved to substantial or critical, meaning 2,000 people with “moderate” needs, who get help with personal care or domestic routines or with work, education or learning across the district, would no longer receive help unless their need becomes critical.

That potential move has already been slammed by Councillor Jeanette Sunderland (Lib Dem, Idle and Thackley) who said that it will “condemn lots of people to long-term loneliness”.

The 2,000 who would be affected include 1,290 aged 65 or over.

Now Mr Nathan is urging those receiving “moderate” help to get in touch because he fears changes will mean intervention happens too late, leaving people in desperate, yet avoidable, need.

“I think it makes much more sense to fight strongly for having a decent level of established support,” he said.

Coun Sunderland told the Telegraph & Argus weeks ago that cutting help for those with moderate needs would affect those managing to live at home independently, and would affect the elderly who needed help getting washed and dressed.

She said: “This is not a subsidy for a football field or a theatre ticket, this is day-to-day help and it is unacceptable to change it.”

Anyone wishing to contact Mr Nathan with their story can call (01274) 395144 or call the T&A on (01274) 705255.

Comments(9)

scanipoos says...
12:53pm Sat 26 Jan 13

And how do they do that most are house bound in this weather . Dont use computers and are hard of hearing so the phones not an option . But then that what im think they want ...No resistance ...

Yorkshire Lass says...
12:54pm Sat 26 Jan 13

Once again the old people are being used as a pawn in the budget cut scheme. Bradford Council should hang their heads in shame as the elderly have already suffered massive losses over the last couple of years. The council are talking of around £1.57m per year to be saved but this is a mere drop in the ocean compared with the spending on schools and predicted spending on new housing requirements. I think and I know a lot of people who would agree, that maybe now is the time to show a bit of compassion to the older generation and give them some support which seems to be lacking at the moment. After all, these people did work hard for this City and are right to expect some support at the most vulnerable time of their lives.

RollandSmoke says...
1:56pm Sat 26 Jan 13

"After the recession of 1989 to 1992 we had to raise taxes because the budget deficit reached dangerous proportions. The alternative of slashing spending and cutting benefits would have been inhuman". David Cameron, 2002

How would you describe it now Mr Cameron?

nowt fresh says...
2:11pm Sat 26 Jan 13

Yorkshire Lass wrote:
Once again the old people are being used as a pawn in the budget cut scheme. Bradford Council should hang their heads in shame as the elderly have already suffered massive losses over the last couple of years. The council are talking of around £1.57m per year to be saved but this is a mere drop in the ocean compared with the spending on schools and predicted spending on new housing requirements. I think and I know a lot of people who would agree, that maybe now is the time to show a bit of compassion to the older generation and give them some support which seems to be lacking at the moment. After all, these people did work hard for this City and are right to expect some support at the most vulnerable time of their lives.
These people are the ones who put their lives on the line for our liberty during the war and we treat them like this, someone has to pay so we will hit the people who can't stand up for themselves as you point out Yorkshire Lass..!!

scanipoos says...
5:48pm Sat 26 Jan 13

Anyone who think Cameron Cares is short sighted, But we also Have to remember it was Labour who first instigated these proposals . benefit cuts ect, Anyone who thought it wouldn't include them was extreamly short sighted. The measure of a decent society is how it looks after its most vulnerable members . AND this government has let its sick, old and disabled down appallingly..

room124 says...
7:54pm Sat 26 Jan 13

And meanwhile senior Council managers and local politicians continue to benefit from huge allowances, expenses, pay-offs, expensive IT equipment and free car parking. Hundreds of thousands of pounds can be found in subsidy of a discredited, drug-addled so called professional sport for a couple of hours of cycling around the outskirts of the District. Meanwhile, the elderly suffer the consequences. Ain't life grand.

Not so simple says...
1:11pm Sun 27 Jan 13

scanipoos wrote:
And how do they do that most are house bound in this weather . Dont use computers and are hard of hearing so the phones not an option . But then that what im think they want ...No resistance ...
Exactly. Doomed to fail the elderly.

Outraged English Subject says...
5:03pm Sun 27 Jan 13

This is simply a criminal and immoral action.

Oldwestbowling says...
10:36pm Sun 27 Jan 13

I wonder how many of you who are up in arms about these cuts were screaming for cuts to the public sector last year? Be careful what you wish for.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree