Benefits changes ‘not understood’ by some Bradford tenants

Claire Stone Claire Stone

The message about looming benefits changes is not getting through to those who will be affected, according to a social housing provider.

Accent Foundation, which owns more than 2,000 homes in the Bradford district, is warning that many tenants do not yet understand the forthcoming welfare reforms, with some mistakenly thinking they will not be affected.

The cuts to benefits will affect claimants aged between 16 and 61.

The first change to come into force will be the under-occupancy penalty, known as the ‘bedroom tax’, and the benefit cap, which both begin in April.

The bedroom tax means social housing residents will lose some of their housing benefit if they have a spare bedroom, whether it is used as a bedroom or not.

And the benefit cap will put a new limit on the total benefits a household can claim.

Accent is giving advice to its residents, and staff are talking to those most at risk, but its chief said she was concerned the message was not getting through.

Managing director Claire Stone said some people mistakenly thought the bedroom tax will not apply to them.

She said: “One thing we have seen is that some residents didn’t think they had a ‘spare bedroom’.

“Some thought that if they weren’t using their ‘spare bedroom’ as a bedroom, or it wasn’t spare – being used when children or other relatives stayed who didn’t live there, or for medical reasons – the bedroom tax wouldn’t affect them.

“This simply isn’t true. The Government has decided how many rooms it will pay housing benefit for depending on how big a family is and what the mix is.

“If residents have more bedrooms than what the Government thinks they need, their housing benefit will be cut.”

She said Accent was also trying to help those on benefits to find employment.

She said: “The best way we can help our residents is by getting them off the welfare benefits system and helping them find jobs.”

Any Accent tenants who are worried about the changes should speak to their housing teams as soon as possible, she said.

Comments(2)

The obvious says...
1:55pm Wed 9 Jan 13

I wonder how the investigation into the kickstart scheme went? Yes accent housing kindly tell us what happened about the investigation you did into the provision of kickstart services?

Secondly

People are deliberately overcrowded in to properties....ask the Bradford advice team and check the amount of large families being forced to squeeze into smaller properties....agains
t the law but down openly for years.

Arrears and evictions will go up.

More homeless.

More overcrowding

More crime

More drugs

More bonuses and higher wages for the housing providers.

Incommunities and accent are not fit for purpose.

People need to realise that bought these housing associations are currently a joke.

Get your street to start a residents association. Get those residents to run for the boards of these housing associations. Make the changes yourself by sacking the lot of these failed and second rate housing providers.

RollandSmoke says...
4:53pm Wed 9 Jan 13

What's not understood? The poorest in society are being thrust further into poverty, face loosing their homes and are demonised by society so as to fund a tax cut for millionaires worth over £2000 per week. To add insult to injury they will have their rent payed directly to them so as to tempt them when they're hungry and/or cold and if through desperation they dip into that money they risk bank charges that will drag them further into debt. Add to that an under inflation rise for the next three years after already having been pegged to CPI rather than RPI and the benefit claimants are screwed. If these agencies were to provide advise on the best way to commit suicide they would at least be being honest about the governments intentions.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree