Plans to safeguard future of National Media Museum in Bradford revealed (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
Plans to safeguard future of National Media Museum in Bradford revealed
7:00am Monday 10th December 2012 in News
By Dolores Cowburn, Bradford Chief Reporter
The National Media Museum in Bradford
Measures are being taken to try to safeguard the future of the National Media Museum in Bradford.
But job losses will be a definite casualty of a spending review triggered after visitor numbers halved in the past decade from a high of a million a year.
Moving archives, reviewing jobs and spending more on exhibitions, galleries and events are all plans aimed at attracting a “bigger and more diverse” audience to the museum.
The Telegraph & Argus revealed in October that the museum had to slash costs after it was found that it spends 30 per cent more per visitor head than other museums in the Science Museum group, which includes the Science Museum, Museum of Science and Industry, National Railway Museum (York) and the National Railway Museum (Shildon).
It suffered a further blow when the BBC announced it would be pulling out of the museum by next March, a move taken by the BBC purely as part of its own cost-saving strategy.
The plan now is to get Bradford in line with the other venues, but the museum has not revealed what the actual spend per head is, or how much the budget is or what it could be reduced to.
A museum spokesman stressed the IMAX cinema is not currently under threat and that all moves were being taken to secure the facility’s future in Bradford. But it has also been revealed museum archives have been moved from Black Dyke Mills to a Science Museum Group-owned store in Swindon to save cash.
A museum spokesman said the spending review was designed to enable it to “spend less on fixed costs and more on exhibitions, galleries and events”.
“We are still in the process of staff consultation so cannot give final details or discuss specific cases, but some roles will be lost and others will be created with the aim of developing a better, affordable future,” he said.
“Savings made this way are only part of the scenario. We are investing in the building infrastructure to deliver lower utility costs. All of these measures are necessary to make the National Media Museum more affordable.”
He said the IMAX was the biggest screen in the region and would be continually assessed to ensure a sustainable future for the museum.
Asked whether there was a threat to the museum’s existence in Bradford, the spokesman added: “Please be assured these changes are being made with the aim of safeguarding the National Media Museum in Bradford. It is a difficult time at the moment, but we are looking forward to an exciting programme of events next year and beyond.
“Visitor numbers for the 2011/12 financial year were 483,000 and we are currently on target to exceed 500,000 visitors this year.
“We have already seen significant year-on-year increases in visitor numbers for our new-look school holiday and family activities which continue in February when Horrid Henry comes to the museum.”
Comments(27)
angry bradfordian
says...
8:33am Mon 10 Dec 12
We should still be proud to have the museum in our city. There aren't many other cities similar to Bradford that can claim half a million visitors a year.
Avro
says...
8:40am Mon 10 Dec 12
Sounds like a swift management change is required along with new ideas of how to increase visitors., year on year is an improvement but along way to go to get back to its glory days..
bhuna156
says...
9:24am Mon 10 Dec 12
The NMM is still one of the best museums in the UK, and still one of the most visited.... It shouldn't matter if visitor numbers have halved from a particularly high number over 10 years ago (which was around the time the "new" museum was opened and it became a free attraction by the way).... It still gets half a million visitors a year! So it's the running costs that is the problem, not the visitor numbers and It sounds like the museum is taking sensible actions ie reducing utility costs and staff cuts, so i'm sure the future of the museum if under no threat.
Apollo
says...
10:10am Mon 10 Dec 12
Joedavid
says...
10:24am Mon 10 Dec 12
Apollo wrote:That seems a silly thing to do as the Imax and the other 2 cinemas provide revenue.
It will probably be closed by the end of next year as funding cuts really bite or be a shadow of its former self. IMAX cinema will probably be the first to go.
wja1966
says...
10:28am Mon 10 Dec 12
Avro
says...
10:50am Mon 10 Dec 12
bhuna156 wrote:RENO alert
Wouldn't moving the archives into the museum attract more visitors?
The NMM is still one of the best museums in the UK, and still one of the most visited.... It shouldn't matter if visitor numbers have halved from a particularly high number over 10 years ago (which was around the time the "new" museum was opened and it became a free attraction by the way).... It still gets half a million visitors a year! So it's the running costs that is the problem, not the visitor numbers and It sounds like the museum is taking sensible actions ie reducing utility costs and staff cuts, so i'm sure the future of the museum if under no threat.
JAtkinson
says...
10:50am Mon 10 Dec 12
Also, had my first visit to Pictureville to see Skyfall on Friday night. It was amazing! Far, far superior to ordinary multi-screen cinemas. Will be going back to Pictureville again and again, and already booked to see The Hobbit on Imax.
If you've loved a visit to the museum, tell people - that's the best way to get visitor numbers up.
Avro
says...
10:55am Mon 10 Dec 12
Albion.
says...
11:26am Mon 10 Dec 12
Mr Bradford
says...
11:44am Mon 10 Dec 12
Avro wrote:I think you do actually.
Funnily enough RENO, the NMM does not even rate in the top 50.. you need to get out more!
http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/List_of_mos
t_visited_museums_in
_the_United_Kingdom
In 2009 it was ranked 23rd in the UK for most visited museums - 10th outside of London, and it would still be in the top 30 this year with half a million visitors.
No museum should be struggling with these sort of visitor figures, so there must be room for cutbacks.
yorkshiredude
says...
12:19pm Mon 10 Dec 12
Immensely important to keep this in the city.
Mr Bradford
says...
12:41pm Mon 10 Dec 12
You'd think a media museum should know how to use the media for its own advantage.
Albion.
says...
1:10pm Mon 10 Dec 12
Mr Bradford wrote:When they are trying to save money?
I remember seeing TV advertising for the museum about 10 years ago, They should start going down that road again.
You'd think a media museum should know how to use the media for its own advantage.
Avro
says...
1:13pm Mon 10 Dec 12
Mr Bradford wrote:It is now 2012
Avro wrote:I think you do actually.
Funnily enough RENO, the NMM does not even rate in the top 50.. you need to get out more!
http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/List_of_mos
t_visited_museums_in
_the_United_Kingdom
In 2009 it was ranked 23rd in the UK for most visited museums - 10th outside of London, and it would still be in the top 30 this year with half a million visitors.
No museum should be struggling with these sort of visitor figures, so there must be room for cutbacks.
Show me where it is CURRENTLY listed in the top 50, because it is not - FACT!
Mr Bradford
says...
1:34pm Mon 10 Dec 12
Avro wrote:According to the facts i just gave you, in 2009 museums with just over 300k visitors feature in the top 40.
Mr Bradford wrote:It is now 2012 Show me where it is CURRENTLY listed in the top 50, because it is not - FACT!Avro wrote: Funnily enough RENO, the NMM does not even rate in the top 50.. you need to get out more!I think you do actually. http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/List_of_mos t_visited_museums_in _the_United_Kingdom In 2009 it was ranked 23rd in the UK for most visited museums - 10th outside of London, and it would still be in the top 30 this year with half a million visitors. No museum should be struggling with these sort of visitor figures, so there must be room for cutbacks.
Are you saying that things have changed so drastically in a few years and significantly more people are now visiting museums so a museum with 500k visitors won't even make the top 50?
angry bradfordian
says...
1:42pm Mon 10 Dec 12
Avro wrote:http://www.guardian.
Mr Bradford wrote:It is now 2012
Avro wrote:I think you do actually.
Funnily enough RENO, the NMM does not even rate in the top 50.. you need to get out more!
http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/List_of_mos
t_visited_museums_in
_the_United_Kingdom
In 2009 it was ranked 23rd in the UK for most visited museums - 10th outside of London, and it would still be in the top 30 this year with half a million visitors.
No museum should be struggling with these sort of visitor figures, so there must be room for cutbacks.
Show me where it is CURRENTLY listed in the top 50, because it is not - FACT!
co.uk/
news/datablog/2012/o
ct/01/
museum-gallery-visit
or-figures-england-d
ata
Currently 21st most popular in England according to the Department of Culture figures....
Cooperlane2
says...
3:14pm Mon 10 Dec 12
cheeky1
says...
5:06pm Mon 10 Dec 12
bcfc1903
says...
5:26pm Mon 10 Dec 12
budbabe
says...
6:41pm Mon 10 Dec 12
there was talk of a walk way link from city pool directly to the Museum - this would help flow of visitors from events to the museum - does anyone know what happened to that?
Joedavid
says...
6:55pm Mon 10 Dec 12
budbabe wrote:The cost we were given for the Park to be was an enormous £24k which had an overspend yet to be declared, so I guess that is why your walk way not provided.
Bradford Council's role and lack of developments should also be brought to task yet again lack of attendance to the NMM is surely directly linked to Bradford image and attractiveness of the destination for visitors - tourism was the heart of policy for Bradford over a decade ago - we now have leisure led cultural services who can't even organise 10k races!
there was talk of a walk way link from city pool directly to the Museum - this would help flow of visitors from events to the museum - does anyone know what happened to that?
bcfc1903
says...
7:58pm Mon 10 Dec 12
justjustice
says...
9:13pm Mon 10 Dec 12
But what exactly has Bradford got to offer? Ghettos filled with troubled asian youth. drug dealing but the same asian youths, and anti-social behavior by yet again the same asian youths!
One would begin to think that the asian youth are being let down by society...Which is of course obvious due to the high levels of unemployment, which everyone is suffering from, but as usual not more so than ethnic minorities.
So what does Bradford have to offer people, apart from the Hole?!
alfucham
says...
6:46am Tue 11 Dec 12
far better to watch the big films on imax than at a multiplex.
More big films will get the numbers up.
10 years back my daughter was four and we were always there for the big films on imax.
Then about 4 years ago they became less frequent.
A tremendous place all the same.
To think the building housing it was one big white elephant (lesson there all you who say build westfield when half the rest of the city looks empty)for ten years after being built by Wardley and Poulson
And then the Alhambra was scheduled for demolition before 9 million rescued it.
Now the Odeon has been reprieved time the council had better start supporting its restoration for the much needed music venue.
Whatever happened to famous bands playing St Georges Hall.
The seventies I saw ossie and Black Sabbath.Genesis (supporting Lindisfarne)Bowie,Fr
ee,
we could go on and on.
Do they all miss Bradford out now?
bhuna156
says...
8:27am Tue 11 Dec 12
So it's more the running costs that is the issue than the actual visitor numbers.
It sounds like they're taking sensible approaches to bring the cost per head down so this is promising.
Joedavid says...
8:08am Mon 10 Dec 12
What about the Pictureville cinema?
That is the best equipped cinema in the country with the unique Cinerama deep curved screen and equipment and all other formats.
I can't see moving things in storage from Bradford to the south being a saving that could not have been done here in Bradford with all the empty property around. Think this is a sinister move.
The Council need to move fast on this one and stop the move before it goes further.