Women's gym plan for former Manningham pool

An artist's impression of the plans An artist's impression of the plans

Plans have been submitted to convert the listed former Manningham Pool building, sold off by Bradford Council earlier this year, into a women-only gym.

The building was sold at auction in March for £85,000 and now listed building consent has been applied for, aiming to “minimise the impact on the existing listed fabric of the pool” in a £750,000 development.

Planning agent Amir Hussain said much of what makes the pool historic would be retained in the plans, including the ceramic lip to the waterline and ceramic spittoons.

He said the building had been bought by businessman Amjad Saddique, who wanted to run it as a gym for women.

The plans include altering the old pool with a new level floor insert. There will also be steps down to the sunken pool floor, which will be used as a studio, with a mezzanine floor above to house gym equipment. There will also be a spa lounge, beauty salon and cafe.

Mr Hussain said: “The proposal is to retain as much of the heritage and integrity of the building as possible. This solution does cost a lot, but we are attempting to draw a balance between preserving the building and it having an economically sustainable future.”

If consent is given, the new gym could be up and running by March.

A design statement accompanying the application states: “Following the sale of the building, the new owners want to not only retain this historical building, but also want to ensure it has a secure, commercially viable future.

“The owner realises the importance of the building both as a heritage asset and to the locality.”

The exterior of the Carlisle Road building would be virtually unchanged under the proposals.

The Grade II listed building closed in July last year as the Council looked to save £119,000 a year, and £1.2 million in repairs was also needed. Campaigners had staged a protest in an attempt to keep the pool open at a candlelit vigil swim. The Victorian Society also backed the campaign with its then director Dr Ian Dungavell describing the building as an “extraordinary intact Edwardian swimming pool”.

Comments(45)

windymiller says...
8:11am Mon 29 Oct 12

Isn't that against equality rules?

Sally Way says...
8:19am Mon 29 Oct 12

That's an original idea isn't it?

We only have hundreds of ladies only gyms.

Come on use your imagination and think of some thing different.

No to gym, mobile phone shop, 99p chicken and chips or a bazaar.

octyvrs says...
8:21am Mon 29 Oct 12

Sexism alive and well in Bradford I see.

Avro says...
8:31am Mon 29 Oct 12

The 2010 equality act says....Single-sex services are permitted where it can be shown to be the most effective way of providing those services or where the service is needed by one sex only.
The Act does not allow discrimination by an association with 25 or more members and who have some form of selection of its members. However, a club or association may restrict their membership to one equality group only but cannot restrict membership to a group defined by colour.

webess says...
8:57am Mon 29 Oct 12

octyvrs wrote:
Sexism alive and well in Bradford I see.
women only gyms are legal and operate all over the country and have done for years..

Avro says...
9:36am Mon 29 Oct 12

Maybe he means that this enterprise will develop into an asian women-only Gym

yorkshiredude says...
10:16am Mon 29 Oct 12

Good news that the building is being brought back to an appropriate use.

Yeme Architects says...
10:47am Mon 29 Oct 12

As the architects for this proposal we have worked incredibly hard, together with the owners and Bradford Council's Conservation Officer, to help ensure the heritage of this iconic building not only survives, but is celebrated.

The reality is that unless the building has an economically viable future it will end up vacant and falling into further disrepair.

Crucially, the plans are designed to ensure all the historic elements including the pool and original coal fired boiler are retained and brought into public display. If at some stage in the future, it is decided to reinstate the water in the pool and return to a swimming pool, it could be done.

It is planned that the building will be opened up on Heritage days and other events so that this fine example of an Edwardian bath house can be experienced by everybody.

windymiller says...
10:53am Mon 29 Oct 12

How can things be brought into public display if it is a womens only gym?

Yeme Architects says...
11:09am Mon 29 Oct 12

windymiller wrote:
How can things be brought into public display if it is a womens only gym?
The building could be opened up to the general public on National Heritage Open Days.

Elements such as the original boiler room, header tank tower, pool perimeter walkway and other service areas have never been publically accessible in the building's history. However, we now seek to express these area's so that they can be experienced.

Albion. says...
11:29am Mon 29 Oct 12

Sally Way wrote:
That's an original idea isn't it?

We only have hundreds of ladies only gyms.

Come on use your imagination and think of some thing different.

No to gym, mobile phone shop, 99p chicken and chips or a bazaar.
SOME ladies probably won't be inclined to use Gyms elsewhere.

scottie dog says...
12:34pm Mon 29 Oct 12

At least it is coming back into use instead of being left to decay and fall into ruin as the Odeon has.

craftykhan says...
12:36pm Mon 29 Oct 12

This is a welcome development especially after the council's cowardly decision to close the swimming pool. At least we get keep this grade2 listed building and in its original splendour... I think women only gym would be very popular and is in walking distance for most people.. Good luck and thank you for investing in Manningham...

The Hoffster says...
1:28pm Mon 29 Oct 12

A lot of Islamophobes in this thread....

Avro says...
1:37pm Mon 29 Oct 12

By chance hit a nerve???

The Hoffster says...
2:06pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Avro wrote:
By chance hit a nerve???
Not really; it was to be expected :)

Bradford_lad81 says...
2:26pm Mon 29 Oct 12

As i said this is about a gym not race or religion. And there is a very clear distinction between freedom of speech and incitment of racial hatred. And i do believe that some of the comments above fall into the latter.

As for my ignoranace, I deplore all acts of violence in any part of the world. Be it islamic/christian/bl
ack/white red or blue.

angry bradfordian says...
3:08pm Mon 29 Oct 12

To get back to the subject in hand.....

It's great to see a historic building with what looks like a sympathetic renovation.
I'd love to know how a private concern can spend money in redeveloping the site with the aim of making a profit when our esteemed council seem to think that it couldn't be kept open on a not-for-profit basis.

Albion. says...
3:16pm Mon 29 Oct 12

angry bradfordian wrote:
To get back to the subject in hand.....

It's great to see a historic building with what looks like a sympathetic renovation.
I'd love to know how a private concern can spend money in redeveloping the site with the aim of making a profit when our esteemed council seem to think that it couldn't be kept open on a not-for-profit basis.
That was as a swimming baths.

angry bradfordian says...
3:46pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Albion. wrote:
angry bradfordian wrote:
To get back to the subject in hand.....

It's great to see a historic building with what looks like a sympathetic renovation.
I'd love to know how a private concern can spend money in redeveloping the site with the aim of making a profit when our esteemed council seem to think that it couldn't be kept open on a not-for-profit basis.
That was as a swimming baths.
I know it was, but they could have had some foresight to change the use, perhaps as an annex to the leisure centre next door.
Bradford Council must have the smallest range of leisure facilities of any major city in the UK.

Patrick Bateman says...
3:47pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Personally I support the plans. I suspect there is a probably a real need out there for Muslim women who would not get the opportunity to go to a gym otherwise.

At my local gym there is a large cohort of Muslim members but they are almost without exception male (a couple of the Asian female members are, I suspect, of Indian extraction). Either their womenfolk are discouraged or prevented from joining because - as this proposal demonstrates - there is clearly a market for it.

It is just a shame that Muslim women are so limited in the choices that they are given.

Albion. says...
3:49pm Mon 29 Oct 12

angry bradfordian wrote:
Albion. wrote:
angry bradfordian wrote:
To get back to the subject in hand.....

It's great to see a historic building with what looks like a sympathetic renovation.
I'd love to know how a private concern can spend money in redeveloping the site with the aim of making a profit when our esteemed council seem to think that it couldn't be kept open on a not-for-profit basis.
That was as a swimming baths.
I know it was, but they could have had some foresight to change the use, perhaps as an annex to the leisure centre next door.
Bradford Council must have the smallest range of leisure facilities of any major city in the UK.
That would have cost money.

angry bradfordian says...
4:21pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Albion. wrote:
angry bradfordian wrote:
Albion. wrote:
angry bradfordian wrote:
To get back to the subject in hand.....

It's great to see a historic building with what looks like a sympathetic renovation.
I'd love to know how a private concern can spend money in redeveloping the site with the aim of making a profit when our esteemed council seem to think that it couldn't be kept open on a not-for-profit basis.
That was as a swimming baths.
I know it was, but they could have had some foresight to change the use, perhaps as an annex to the leisure centre next door.
Bradford Council must have the smallest range of leisure facilities of any major city in the UK.
That would have cost money.
Yes, it's a shame the council don't have any spare funds from something like an airport sell-off like Leeds did (oh....)

It seems strange that a relatively small private company can afford to redevelop a building directly next to a council leisure centre and still hope to make a profit.
However a major organisation with executives on £100k plus and a multi million pound budget can't do it on a not-for-profit basis.

octyvrs says...
6:35pm Mon 29 Oct 12

webess wrote:
octyvrs wrote:
Sexism alive and well in Bradford I see.
women only gyms are legal and operate all over the country and have done for years..
Good, I'm glad. They should be segregation. If I went to a gym I don't think I'd want a load of women in it either.

Albion. says...
6:54pm Mon 29 Oct 12

angry bradfordian wrote:
Albion. wrote:
angry bradfordian wrote:
Albion. wrote:
angry bradfordian wrote:
To get back to the subject in hand.....

It's great to see a historic building with what looks like a sympathetic renovation.
I'd love to know how a private concern can spend money in redeveloping the site with the aim of making a profit when our esteemed council seem to think that it couldn't be kept open on a not-for-profit basis.
That was as a swimming baths.
I know it was, but they could have had some foresight to change the use, perhaps as an annex to the leisure centre next door.
Bradford Council must have the smallest range of leisure facilities of any major city in the UK.
That would have cost money.
Yes, it's a shame the council don't have any spare funds from something like an airport sell-off like Leeds did (oh....)

It seems strange that a relatively small private company can afford to redevelop a building directly next to a council leisure centre and still hope to make a profit.
However a major organisation with executives on £100k plus and a multi million pound budget can't do it on a not-for-profit basis.
The council got the cash, don't take any risks and the property is being developed to appeal to the local community (well, half of it).
Don't imagine that I'm standing up for the council here, my past record certainly proves otherwise, but they couldn't knock it down and it isn't in a good location for anyone but the locals, so flog it and let someone else worry about it seems the best option to me.

Apollo says...
7:09pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Muslim only is what the headline means.

angry bradfordian says...
7:15pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Albion. wrote:
angry bradfordian wrote:
Albion. wrote:
angry bradfordian wrote:
Albion. wrote:
angry bradfordian wrote:
To get back to the subject in hand.....

It's great to see a historic building with what looks like a sympathetic renovation.
I'd love to know how a private concern can spend money in redeveloping the site with the aim of making a profit when our esteemed council seem to think that it couldn't be kept open on a not-for-profit basis.
That was as a swimming baths.
I know it was, but they could have had some foresight to change the use, perhaps as an annex to the leisure centre next door.
Bradford Council must have the smallest range of leisure facilities of any major city in the UK.
That would have cost money.
Yes, it's a shame the council don't have any spare funds from something like an airport sell-off like Leeds did (oh....)

It seems strange that a relatively small private company can afford to redevelop a building directly next to a council leisure centre and still hope to make a profit.
However a major organisation with executives on £100k plus and a multi million pound budget can't do it on a not-for-profit basis.
The council got the cash, don't take any risks and the property is being developed to appeal to the local community (well, half of it).
Don't imagine that I'm standing up for the council here, my past record certainly proves otherwise, but they couldn't knock it down and it isn't in a good location for anyone but the locals, so flog it and let someone else worry about it seems the best option to me.
Completely agree.
I wouldn't begrudge the salary that the executive officers on the council are getting if they had the talent that they'd have to get paid that much in the private sector.
Look at the regeneration (or should that be degeneration) chief. If he'd produced result like that in the private sector he wouldn't have a job now.

octyvrs says...
8:03pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Apollo wrote:
Muslim only is what the headline means.
Ssshhhh! Not so loud! We can think it but we're not allowed to say it. It's naughty.

The Hoffster says...
8:12pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Apollo wrote:
Muslim only is what the headline means.
Be quiet, BNP/EDL chav supporter.

Oh, and Islamophobe too.

Saltaire Bantam says...
8:41pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Why can't muslim women and men go to the same gym? We are living in a civilised western country and not the middle east in the 7th century. It is illegal for non muslims to be sexist but it is perfectly acceptable for muslims.

Sally Way says...
9:01pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Saltaire Bantam wrote:
Why can't muslim women and men go to the same gym? We are living in a civilised western country and not the middle east in the 7th century. It is illegal for non muslims to be sexist but it is perfectly acceptable for muslims.
Mr Bantam do you live in the real world ?

Most gyms have Muslim men and Muslim ladies as members. But you wouldn't know that as you struggle to get off your lazy backside and join a gym.

No where does it say its a Muslim lady gym only. Do you really think a businessman will turn a non-Muslim away.

When you open a gym in Manningham an high Asian area most of your member will be from this community.

Just like someone opening a gym in Harrogate will mainly have white members.would that make them racist?
I know wasting my time on you.

The Hoffster says...
10:01pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Saltaire Bantam wrote:
Why can't muslim women and men go to the same gym? We are living in a civilised western country and not the middle east in the 7th century. It is illegal for non muslims to be sexist but it is perfectly acceptable for muslims.
Why do many *non*-Muslim women prefer to exercise in women-only gyms, Islamophobe ?

Care to explain that one ?

thelastmanstanding says...
10:30pm Mon 29 Oct 12

I WOULD BE GLAD TO SEE IT STILL BEING USED AS A RECREATION FACILITY, ALBEIT A WOMENS ONLY ONE, AND HOPE IT DOESN'T GET LEFT TO GO THE SAME WAY AS THE ODEON BUILDING.

Patrick Bateman says...
10:54pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Sally Way wrote:
Saltaire Bantam wrote:
Why can't muslim women and men go to the same gym? We are living in a civilised western country and not the middle east in the 7th century. It is illegal for non muslims to be sexist but it is perfectly acceptable for muslims.
Mr Bantam do you live in the real world ?

Most gyms have Muslim men and Muslim ladies as members. But you wouldn't know that as you struggle to get off your lazy backside and join a gym.

No where does it say its a Muslim lady gym only. Do you really think a businessman will turn a non-Muslim away.

When you open a gym in Manningham an high Asian area most of your member will be from this community.

Just like someone opening a gym in Harrogate will mainly have white members.would that make them racist?
I know wasting my time on you.
Nonsense! As I said previously upthread the one I go to has many Muslim male members but almost zero female Muslim members. Why is that do you think? The answer I believe is that they are either discouraged or not allowed to join or there may be some other cultural reason that prevents them from going (although I suspect it is the former explanation). I should add that it cannot be explained away on 'immodesty' grounds either (that is to say they don't go to the gym for fear of being ogled at or being in the presence of men) as their is a large and seemingly underused 'women only' section available.

As I said originally I support the plans for the women's Muslim gym as I feel they would not get the opportunity -or would be permitted - to use this type of facility otherwise (which is a great shame).

Patrick Bateman says...
10:56pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Ouch! I meant 'there' not 'their' *blush*

Patrick Bateman says...
11:00pm Mon 29 Oct 12

The Hoffster wrote:
Saltaire Bantam wrote:
Why can't muslim women and men go to the same gym? We are living in a civilised western country and not the middle east in the 7th century. It is illegal for non muslims to be sexist but it is perfectly acceptable for muslims.
Why do many *non*-Muslim women prefer to exercise in women-only gyms, Islamophobe ?

Care to explain that one ?
"Why do many non-Muslum women prefer to exercise in women-only gyms?"

The answer is that they are sick of being leered and perved-over by Muslim men (or so they tell me). My own wife stopped going to the gym as she was fed up by their boorish behaviour,

I hope that answers your question.

Thanks.

spark9990 says...
9:45am Tue 30 Oct 12

Patrick Bateman wrote:
Sally Way wrote:
Saltaire Bantam wrote:
Why can't muslim women and men go to the same gym? We are living in a civilised western country and not the middle east in the 7th century. It is illegal for non muslims to be sexist but it is perfectly acceptable for muslims.
Mr Bantam do you live in the real world ?

Most gyms have Muslim men and Muslim ladies as members. But you wouldn't know that as you struggle to get off your lazy backside and join a gym.

No where does it say its a Muslim lady gym only. Do you really think a businessman will turn a non-Muslim away.

When you open a gym in Manningham an high Asian area most of your member will be from this community.

Just like someone opening a gym in Harrogate will mainly have white members.would that make them racist?
I know wasting my time on you.
Nonsense! As I said previously upthread the one I go to has many Muslim male members but almost zero female Muslim members. Why is that do you think? The answer I believe is that they are either discouraged or not allowed to join or there may be some other cultural reason that prevents them from going (although I suspect it is the former explanation). I should add that it cannot be explained away on 'immodesty' grounds either (that is to say they don't go to the gym for fear of being ogled at or being in the presence of men) as their is a large and seemingly underused 'women only' section available.

As I said originally I support the plans for the women's Muslim gym as I feel they would not get the opportunity -or would be permitted - to use this type of facility otherwise (which is a great shame).
Nonsense! to you as well. The gym I go to has many muslim women and just a few muslim men - including me (but I only use the cardio and light weight sections). My wife's friend works in harrogate (a non-muslim), she attends women only gym sessions (shock!!).

Albion. says...
11:07am Tue 30 Oct 12

spark9990 wrote:
Patrick Bateman wrote:
Sally Way wrote:
Saltaire Bantam wrote:
Why can't muslim women and men go to the same gym? We are living in a civilised western country and not the middle east in the 7th century. It is illegal for non muslims to be sexist but it is perfectly acceptable for muslims.
Mr Bantam do you live in the real world ?

Most gyms have Muslim men and Muslim ladies as members. But you wouldn't know that as you struggle to get off your lazy backside and join a gym.

No where does it say its a Muslim lady gym only. Do you really think a businessman will turn a non-Muslim away.

When you open a gym in Manningham an high Asian area most of your member will be from this community.

Just like someone opening a gym in Harrogate will mainly have white members.would that make them racist?
I know wasting my time on you.
Nonsense! As I said previously upthread the one I go to has many Muslim male members but almost zero female Muslim members. Why is that do you think? The answer I believe is that they are either discouraged or not allowed to join or there may be some other cultural reason that prevents them from going (although I suspect it is the former explanation). I should add that it cannot be explained away on 'immodesty' grounds either (that is to say they don't go to the gym for fear of being ogled at or being in the presence of men) as their is a large and seemingly underused 'women only' section available.

As I said originally I support the plans for the women's Muslim gym as I feel they would not get the opportunity -or would be permitted - to use this type of facility otherwise (which is a great shame).
Nonsense! to you as well. The gym I go to has many muslim women and just a few muslim men - including me (but I only use the cardio and light weight sections). My wife's friend works in harrogate (a non-muslim), she attends women only gym sessions (shock!!).
Apart from the obvious (someone named Mohammed) how do you know who is Muslim or a follower of any other religious structure?

spark9990 says...
11:13am Tue 30 Oct 12

Albion. wrote:
spark9990 wrote:
Patrick Bateman wrote:
Sally Way wrote:
Saltaire Bantam wrote:
Why can't muslim women and men go to the same gym? We are living in a civilised western country and not the middle east in the 7th century. It is illegal for non muslims to be sexist but it is perfectly acceptable for muslims.
Mr Bantam do you live in the real world ?

Most gyms have Muslim men and Muslim ladies as members. But you wouldn't know that as you struggle to get off your lazy backside and join a gym.

No where does it say its a Muslim lady gym only. Do you really think a businessman will turn a non-Muslim away.

When you open a gym in Manningham an high Asian area most of your member will be from this community.

Just like someone opening a gym in Harrogate will mainly have white members.would that make them racist?
I know wasting my time on you.
Nonsense! As I said previously upthread the one I go to has many Muslim male members but almost zero female Muslim members. Why is that do you think? The answer I believe is that they are either discouraged or not allowed to join or there may be some other cultural reason that prevents them from going (although I suspect it is the former explanation). I should add that it cannot be explained away on 'immodesty' grounds either (that is to say they don't go to the gym for fear of being ogled at or being in the presence of men) as their is a large and seemingly underused 'women only' section available.

As I said originally I support the plans for the women's Muslim gym as I feel they would not get the opportunity -or would be permitted - to use this type of facility otherwise (which is a great shame).
Nonsense! to you as well. The gym I go to has many muslim women and just a few muslim men - including me (but I only use the cardio and light weight sections). My wife's friend works in harrogate (a non-muslim), she attends women only gym sessions (shock!!).
Apart from the obvious (someone named Mohammed) how do you know who is Muslim or a follower of any other religious structure?
From their head wear + occasionally hearing their names when they call each other.

Andy2010 says...
12:12pm Tue 30 Oct 12

I have nothing against female only gyms but the location of this one more or less rules out any white woman from going.

What white woman in their right mind is going to walk around this area on an evening.

Patrick Bateman says...
1:24pm Tue 30 Oct 12

spark9990 wrote:
Patrick Bateman wrote:
Sally Way wrote:
Saltaire Bantam wrote:
Why can't muslim women and men go to the same gym? We are living in a civilised western country and not the middle east in the 7th century. It is illegal for non muslims to be sexist but it is perfectly acceptable for muslims.
Mr Bantam do you live in the real world ?

Most gyms have Muslim men and Muslim ladies as members. But you wouldn't know that as you struggle to get off your lazy backside and join a gym.

No where does it say its a Muslim lady gym only. Do you really think a businessman will turn a non-Muslim away.

When you open a gym in Manningham an high Asian area most of your member will be from this community.

Just like someone opening a gym in Harrogate will mainly have white members.would that make them racist?
I know wasting my time on you.
Nonsense! As I said previously upthread the one I go to has many Muslim male members but almost zero female Muslim members. Why is that do you think? The answer I believe is that they are either discouraged or not allowed to join or there may be some other cultural reason that prevents them from going (although I suspect it is the former explanation). I should add that it cannot be explained away on 'immodesty' grounds either (that is to say they don't go to the gym for fear of being ogled at or being in the presence of men) as their is a large and seemingly underused 'women only' section available.

As I said originally I support the plans for the women's Muslim gym as I feel they would not get the opportunity -or would be permitted - to use this type of facility otherwise (which is a great shame).
Nonsense! to you as well. The gym I go to has many muslim women and just a few muslim men - including me (but I only use the cardio and light weight sections). My wife's friend works in harrogate (a non-muslim), she attends women only gym sessions (shock!!).
Clearly your experience of local gyms is very different from mine. I can't see the relevance of your friend from Harrogate's preference to women-only gyms as I imagine there are very few Muslims there to use it (unlike here of course). Of course there will be a minority of women everywhere that for whatever reason prefer to exercise exclusively in the company of other women (hardly a 'shock!!') but that's only one part of the issue in our 'home-grown' case.

The Hoffster says...
4:00pm Tue 30 Oct 12

Andy2010 wrote:
I have nothing against female only gyms but the location of this one more or less rules out any white woman from going.

What white woman in their right mind is going to walk around this area on an evening.
It's like saying which Asian or Black woman will walk around BNP/EDL chav hell-holes like Holmewood, Queensbury, Fagley, Idle, Buttershaw et al...

It just doesn't make sense.

Storms. says...
11:25pm Tue 30 Oct 12

lol @ PatrickBateman and other angry racists I'd like to jump on the bandwagon aswell.

In my gym a third are white men, a third white women and a third muslim men.

The white men have never leered at the women, however the muslim men leer all the time resulting in all the women leaving (just like Patricks wife).

That has meant that now we are a 100% male gym. But the muslims still seem to enjoy leering at us white men when we wear lycra, but I refuse to leave... in fact I quite enjoy the attention ;)

On a serious note though the following facts apply to every gym the world over but some here seem to be twisting these basic facts to suit a racist agenda:
1. There will always be more men in the free weights section in any gym.
2. There will always be more women in the classes in any gym
3. Conservative women will prefer female only gyms.
4. Heterosexual men like looking at fit women

SinnerSaint says...
9:03am Wed 31 Oct 12

The Hoffster wrote:
Andy2010 wrote:
I have nothing against female only gyms but the location of this one more or less rules out any white woman from going.

What white woman in their right mind is going to walk around this area on an evening.
It's like saying which Asian or Black woman will walk around BNP/EDL chav hell-holes like Holmewood, Queensbury, Fagley, Idle, Buttershaw et al...

It just doesn't make sense.
So I take it you won't be happy until the whole city is like Manningham and Girlington?

What a heavenly place that would be.

Another Landless Peasant says...
5:34pm Thu 1 Nov 12

Andy2010 wrote:
I have nothing against female only gyms but the location of this one more or less rules out any white woman from going.

What white woman in their right mind is going to walk around this area on an evening.
god you're such an ignoramus. There are plenty of white women/people in Manningham, it's a very mixed area actually. You should get out more.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree