News RSS Feed


Stu will not tolerate City slackers

7:16am Saturday 17th May 2008

Comments (78)   Have your say »

By Simon Parker »

Stuart McCall will come down hard on any City players that enjoy their summer break to excess.

McCall was unhappy that several turned up for pre-season last year in less than tip-top shape.

And he has made it clear that he will not accept a repeat when the squad returns to training on July 1.

While the City boss wants the players to let off some steam during the off-season, he expects them to come back fit and ready for action.

Each player has been given an individual fitness programme to follow during the summer and McCall will not stand for any slacking.

"There were a few let themselves down last summer," he admitted. "We had to have a little splinter group doing their own running when we started off because they weren't up to joining in with the rest.

"That won't happen again and I want all of them starting at a similar level physically.

"It's changed since my day as a player when everyone used to come back half a stone overweight. We'd all spend the first week being sick because the only thing we did was run.

"Now we want to get into ball work early on and start working on things and obviously you've got to have a decent level of fitness to do that."

McCall has been pleased with the improvement in Omar Daley's fitness over the season. He was one of those who struggled at the start.

Barry Conlon, having signed a new six-month deal, will be another one the manager will be keeping a close eye on.

"He needs to come back in a better physical shape than before so he can put himself up for selection early on," added McCall. "But you've seen how he has improved markedly in that area during the season.

"Of course central midfielders and lads like Kyle Nix are going to be able to run for a lot longer than strikers but you must be up to a certain level.

"There's no need spending three weeks of pre-season running because you're not gaining anything from that."

  • Start or join a debate on this issue in our online forum - Click here
Print article » Email to a friend »

Your Say YourBradford

Bendix, skipton says...
12:12pm Mon 19 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
A little help for you:
There should be they're (short for they are) and arnt should be aren't (short for are not).
Eight out of ten for effort, but only one for attainment. You must try harder.
Report this post »

Bendix, skipton says...
12:12pm Mon 19 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
A little help for you:
There should be they're (short for they are) and arnt should be aren't (short for are not).
Eight out of ten for effort, but only one for attainment. You must try harder.
Report this post »

Bendix, skipton says...
12:12pm Mon 19 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
A little help for you:
There should be they're (short for they are) and arnt should be aren't (short for are not).
Eight out of ten for effort, but only one for attainment. You must try harder.
Report this post »

Bendix, skipton says...
12:12pm Mon 19 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
A little help for you:
There should be they're (short for they are) and arnt should be aren't (short for are not).
Eight out of ten for effort, but only one for attainment. You must try harder.
Report this post »

Bendix, skipton says...
12:12pm Mon 19 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
A little help for you:
There should be they're (short for they are) and arnt should be aren't (short for are not).
Eight out of ten for effort, but only one for attainment. You must try harder.
Report this post »

Bendix, skipton says...
12:12pm Mon 19 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
A little help for you:
There should be they're (short for they are) and arnt should be aren't (short for are not).
Eight out of ten for effort, but only one for attainment. You must try harder.
Report this post »

boparob, Bradford says...
12:04pm Mon 19 May 08

Oxford Bantam wrote:
Mr Sensible wrote: Wish I could meet Gentleman Jim when I am fishing, a bite every time. Be honest Jim what are City going to achieve next season that they didn't this. You know and I know they are in free fall taking a lot of fall guys with them - See Sense.
TiT.
replace the "i" with "wa"
Report this post »

boparob, Bradford says...
12:04pm Mon 19 May 08

Oxford Bantam wrote:
Mr Sensible wrote: Wish I could meet Gentleman Jim when I am fishing, a bite every time. Be honest Jim what are City going to achieve next season that they didn't this. You know and I know they are in free fall taking a lot of fall guys with them - See Sense.
TiT.
replace the "i" with "wa"
Report this post »

boparob, Bradford says...
12:04pm Mon 19 May 08

Oxford Bantam wrote:
Mr Sensible wrote: Wish I could meet Gentleman Jim when I am fishing, a bite every time. Be honest Jim what are City going to achieve next season that they didn't this. You know and I know they are in free fall taking a lot of fall guys with them - See Sense.
TiT.
replace the "i" with "wa"
Report this post »

The Russian, Brizzal says...
8:08am Mon 19 May 08

Darryl wrote:
Mr Sensible wrote: I am sorry to inform you that City have not levelled out yet, still a lot of free falling to do before that can even be considered. 10th in 4th Division is a fact not fiction.
Don't apologise, 10th in div 4 is FACT, although breaking even for the first time in 8 years, and seeing us potentially AGAIN be the biggest club in our division deems us as a club in progression, not decline. CTID
I know we shouldn't acknowledge any comment by SENSIBASTARD but Darryl makes a valid point in response. Perhaps the negatives on this site should take a look back at the start of last season and how many players that came to CITY were those that STU was chasing?. Considering most the players came on recommendation I think he did a bloody good job. Judge him and his backroom staff after next season when the team will have been put together from his own list. I feel GOOD !!
Report this post »

The Russian, Brizzal says...
8:08am Mon 19 May 08

Darryl wrote:
Mr Sensible wrote: I am sorry to inform you that City have not levelled out yet, still a lot of free falling to do before that can even be considered. 10th in 4th Division is a fact not fiction.
Don't apologise, 10th in div 4 is FACT, although breaking even for the first time in 8 years, and seeing us potentially AGAIN be the biggest club in our division deems us as a club in progression, not decline. CTID
I know we shouldn't acknowledge any comment by SENSIBASTARD but Darryl makes a valid point in response. Perhaps the negatives on this site should take a look back at the start of last season and how many players that came to CITY were those that STU was chasing?. Considering most the players came on recommendation I think he did a bloody good job. Judge him and his backroom staff after next season when the team will have been put together from his own list. I feel GOOD !!
Report this post »

The Russian, Brizzal says...
8:08am Mon 19 May 08

Darryl wrote:
Mr Sensible wrote: I am sorry to inform you that City have not levelled out yet, still a lot of free falling to do before that can even be considered. 10th in 4th Division is a fact not fiction.
Don't apologise, 10th in div 4 is FACT, although breaking even for the first time in 8 years, and seeing us potentially AGAIN be the biggest club in our division deems us as a club in progression, not decline. CTID
I know we shouldn't acknowledge any comment by SENSIBASTARD but Darryl makes a valid point in response. Perhaps the negatives on this site should take a look back at the start of last season and how many players that came to CITY were those that STU was chasing?. Considering most the players came on recommendation I think he did a bloody good job. Judge him and his backroom staff after next season when the team will have been put together from his own list. I feel GOOD !!
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
12:18am Mon 19 May 08

Mr Sensible wrote:
I am sorry to inform you that City have not levelled out yet, still a lot of free falling to do before that can even be considered. 10th in 4th Division is a fact not fiction.
Don't apologise, 10th in div 4 is FACT, although breaking even for the first time in 8 years, and seeing us potentially AGAIN be the biggest club in our division deems us as a club in progression, not decline. CTID
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
12:18am Mon 19 May 08

Mr Sensible wrote:
I am sorry to inform you that City have not levelled out yet, still a lot of free falling to do before that can even be considered. 10th in 4th Division is a fact not fiction.
Don't apologise, 10th in div 4 is FACT, although breaking even for the first time in 8 years, and seeing us potentially AGAIN be the biggest club in our division deems us as a club in progression, not decline. CTID
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
12:18am Mon 19 May 08

Mr Sensible wrote:
I am sorry to inform you that City have not levelled out yet, still a lot of free falling to do before that can even be considered. 10th in 4th Division is a fact not fiction.
Don't apologise, 10th in div 4 is FACT, although breaking even for the first time in 8 years, and seeing us potentially AGAIN be the biggest club in our division deems us as a club in progression, not decline. CTID
Report this post »

Chris, Bradford says...
9:47pm Sun 18 May 08

billy_bremner wrote:
daley wont be at bradford at the start of the season. Watch this space
Good
Report this post »

Chris, Bradford says...
9:47pm Sun 18 May 08

billy_bremner wrote:
daley wont be at bradford at the start of the season. Watch this space
Good
Report this post »

Chris, Bradford says...
9:47pm Sun 18 May 08

billy_bremner wrote:
daley wont be at bradford at the start of the season. Watch this space
Good
Report this post »

Mr Sensible, Bingley says...
6:32pm Sun 18 May 08

I am sorry to inform you that City have not levelled out yet, still a lot of free falling to do before that can even be considered. 10th in 4th Division is a fact not fiction.
Report this post »

Mr Sensible, Bingley says...
6:32pm Sun 18 May 08

I am sorry to inform you that City have not levelled out yet, still a lot of free falling to do before that can even be considered. 10th in 4th Division is a fact not fiction.
Report this post »

Mr Sensible, Bingley says...
6:32pm Sun 18 May 08

I am sorry to inform you that City have not levelled out yet, still a lot of free falling to do before that can even be considered. 10th in 4th Division is a fact not fiction.
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
1:28pm Sun 18 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
So what if we are, Rochdale and Stockport will ratify, it doesn't matter which division you're in, if you have success then it's a happy time for fans, I SO hope we can see and feel that success again, it might not be the Champions League, but I really don't care, success is success, and I feel we've levelled out now, and good times are right around the corner. CTID
Yeah but they do suck.
In that case you must BLOW then!!?!! Touche. CTID
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
1:28pm Sun 18 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
So what if we are, Rochdale and Stockport will ratify, it doesn't matter which division you're in, if you have success then it's a happy time for fans, I SO hope we can see and feel that success again, it might not be the Champions League, but I really don't care, success is success, and I feel we've levelled out now, and good times are right around the corner. CTID
Yeah but they do suck.
In that case you must BLOW then!!?!! Touche. CTID
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
1:28pm Sun 18 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
So what if we are, Rochdale and Stockport will ratify, it doesn't matter which division you're in, if you have success then it's a happy time for fans, I SO hope we can see and feel that success again, it might not be the Champions League, but I really don't care, success is success, and I feel we've levelled out now, and good times are right around the corner. CTID
Yeah but they do suck.
In that case you must BLOW then!!?!! Touche. CTID
Report this post »

LeagueJunkie!!!, Lost Again. says...
12:18pm Sun 18 May 08

Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
So what if we are, Rochdale and Stockport will ratify, it doesn't matter which division you're in, if you have success then it's a happy time for fans, I SO hope we can see and feel that success again, it might not be the Champions League, but I really don't care, success is success, and I feel we've levelled out now, and good times are right around the corner. CTID
Yeah but they do suck.
Report this post »

LeagueJunkie!!!, Lost Again. says...
12:18pm Sun 18 May 08

Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
So what if we are, Rochdale and Stockport will ratify, it doesn't matter which division you're in, if you have success then it's a happy time for fans, I SO hope we can see and feel that success again, it might not be the Champions League, but I really don't care, success is success, and I feel we've levelled out now, and good times are right around the corner. CTID
Yeah but they do suck.
Report this post »

LeagueJunkie!!!, Lost Again. says...
12:18pm Sun 18 May 08

Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
So what if we are, Rochdale and Stockport will ratify, it doesn't matter which division you're in, if you have success then it's a happy time for fans, I SO hope we can see and feel that success again, it might not be the Champions League, but I really don't care, success is success, and I feel we've levelled out now, and good times are right around the corner. CTID
Yeah but they do suck.
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
2:41am Sun 18 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
So what if we are, Rochdale and Stockport will ratify, it doesn't matter which division you're in, if you have success then it's a happy time for fans, I SO hope we can see and feel that success again, it might not be the Champions League, but I really don't care, success is success, and I feel we've levelled out now, and good times are right around the corner. CTID
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
2:41am Sun 18 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
So what if we are, Rochdale and Stockport will ratify, it doesn't matter which division you're in, if you have success then it's a happy time for fans, I SO hope we can see and feel that success again, it might not be the Champions League, but I really don't care, success is success, and I feel we've levelled out now, and good times are right around the corner. CTID
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
2:41am Sun 18 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they? That could be why they suck.
So what if we are, Rochdale and Stockport will ratify, it doesn't matter which division you're in, if you have success then it's a happy time for fans, I SO hope we can see and feel that success again, it might not be the Champions League, but I really don't care, success is success, and I feel we've levelled out now, and good times are right around the corner. CTID
Report this post »

Oxford Bantam, Oxford says...
8:28pm Sat 17 May 08

Mr Sensible wrote:
Wish I could meet Gentleman Jim when I am fishing, a bite every time. Be honest Jim what are City going to achieve next season that they didn't this. You know and I know they are in free fall taking a lot of fall guys with them - See Sense.
TiT.
Report this post »

Oxford Bantam, Oxford says...
8:28pm Sat 17 May 08

Mr Sensible wrote:
Wish I could meet Gentleman Jim when I am fishing, a bite every time. Be honest Jim what are City going to achieve next season that they didn't this. You know and I know they are in free fall taking a lot of fall guys with them - See Sense.
TiT.
Report this post »

Oxford Bantam, Oxford says...
8:28pm Sat 17 May 08

Mr Sensible wrote:
Wish I could meet Gentleman Jim when I am fishing, a bite every time. Be honest Jim what are City going to achieve next season that they didn't this. You know and I know they are in free fall taking a lot of fall guys with them - See Sense.
TiT.
Report this post »

Mr Sensible, Bingley says...
8:05pm Sat 17 May 08

Wish I could meet Gentleman Jim when I am fishing, a bite every time. Be honest Jim what are City going to achieve next season that they didn't this. You know and I know they are in free fall taking a lot of fall guys with them - See Sense.
Report this post »

Mr Sensible, Bingley says...
8:05pm Sat 17 May 08

Wish I could meet Gentleman Jim when I am fishing, a bite every time. Be honest Jim what are City going to achieve next season that they didn't this. You know and I know they are in free fall taking a lot of fall guys with them - See Sense.
Report this post »

Mr Sensible, Bingley says...
8:05pm Sat 17 May 08

Wish I could meet Gentleman Jim when I am fishing, a bite every time. Be honest Jim what are City going to achieve next season that they didn't this. You know and I know they are in free fall taking a lot of fall guys with them - See Sense.
Report this post »

LeagueJunkie!!!, Lost Again. says...
7:52pm Sat 17 May 08

Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they?

That could be why they suck.
Report this post »

LeagueJunkie!!!, Lost Again. says...
7:52pm Sat 17 May 08

Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they?

That could be why they suck.
Report this post »

LeagueJunkie!!!, Lost Again. says...
7:52pm Sat 17 May 08

Darryl wrote:
LeagueJunkie!!! wrote: Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
I mean, there in the lowest division in the football league arnt they?

That could be why they suck.
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
6:08pm Sat 17 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
6:08pm Sat 17 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
6:08pm Sat 17 May 08

LeagueJunkie!!! wrote:
Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Why? CTID
Report this post »

LeagueJunkie!!!, Lost Again. says...
5:28pm Sat 17 May 08

Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Report this post »

LeagueJunkie!!!, Lost Again. says...
5:28pm Sat 17 May 08

Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Report this post »

LeagueJunkie!!!, Lost Again. says...
5:28pm Sat 17 May 08

Youve got to admit, City really do suck.
Report this post »

Gentleman Jim, Yooohooo over here says...
5:04pm Sat 17 May 08

Complete twaddle as per. Sheff U have a conditioning coach, Sm's job at Sheffield was as a coach, that was taking the managers directives and working on them at the training ground, sometimes adding a personal twist, sometimes using own initiative, but fitness is not a job attributed to coaches in the modern game. Even City in the 4th division use a conditioning coach and don't waste the time and efforts of someone helping with tactics. Ongoing fitness is monitored and implemented by the club and both manager and 1st team coach are nvolved if and when necessary but to attempt another twisted blemish is just the pathetic mind of a silly girl, again. I'm sure Brian Kidd would love to have his pedigree as a tactician reduced to the level of a gym instructor. Any facts for us yet silly girl?
Report this post »

Gentleman Jim, Yooohooo over here says...
5:04pm Sat 17 May 08

Complete twaddle as per. Sheff U have a conditioning coach, Sm's job at Sheffield was as a coach, that was taking the managers directives and working on them at the training ground, sometimes adding a personal twist, sometimes using own initiative, but fitness is not a job attributed to coaches in the modern game. Even City in the 4th division use a conditioning coach and don't waste the time and efforts of someone helping with tactics. Ongoing fitness is monitored and implemented by the club and both manager and 1st team coach are nvolved if and when necessary but to attempt another twisted blemish is just the pathetic mind of a silly girl, again. I'm sure Brian Kidd would love to have his pedigree as a tactician reduced to the level of a gym instructor. Any facts for us yet silly girl?
Report this post »

Gentleman Jim, Yooohooo over here says...
5:04pm Sat 17 May 08

Complete twaddle as per. Sheff U have a conditioning coach, Sm's job at Sheffield was as a coach, that was taking the managers directives and working on them at the training ground, sometimes adding a personal twist, sometimes using own initiative, but fitness is not a job attributed to coaches in the modern game. Even City in the 4th division use a conditioning coach and don't waste the time and efforts of someone helping with tactics. Ongoing fitness is monitored and implemented by the club and both manager and 1st team coach are nvolved if and when necessary but to attempt another twisted blemish is just the pathetic mind of a silly girl, again. I'm sure Brian Kidd would love to have his pedigree as a tactician reduced to the level of a gym instructor. Any facts for us yet silly girl?
Report this post »

Mr Sensible, Bingley says...
4:06pm Sat 17 May 08

Sheffield United had to get Brian Kidd in to get their players into shape so it appears City have taken on their problems (In more ways than one).
Report this post »

Mr Sensible, Bingley says...
4:06pm Sat 17 May 08

Sheffield United had to get Brian Kidd in to get their players into shape so it appears City have taken on their problems (In more ways than one).
Report this post »

Mr Sensible, Bingley says...
4:06pm Sat 17 May 08

Sheffield United had to get Brian Kidd in to get their players into shape so it appears City have taken on their problems (In more ways than one).
Report this post »

seanary, Bradford says...
1:54pm Sat 17 May 08

Even if it isn't true, the thought of Daley leaving has just brightened up my day. The thought of Donny winning at Wembley also sends a warm sensation to special places.

With regards to the story, I am not one to criticise McGod but it does seem to suggest that he may have tolerated a bit of slacking this season which you just would'nt expect from someone with his winning mentality. Either that or the T&A really do have nothing to report.
Report this post »

seanary, Bradford says...
1:54pm Sat 17 May 08

Even if it isn't true, the thought of Daley leaving has just brightened up my day. The thought of Donny winning at Wembley also sends a warm sensation to special places.

With regards to the story, I am not one to criticise McGod but it does seem to suggest that he may have tolerated a bit of slacking this season which you just would'nt expect from someone with his winning mentality. Either that or the T&A really do have nothing to report.
Report this post »

seanary, Bradford says...
1:54pm Sat 17 May 08

Even if it isn't true, the thought of Daley leaving has just brightened up my day. The thought of Donny winning at Wembley also sends a warm sensation to special places.

With regards to the story, I am not one to criticise McGod but it does seem to suggest that he may have tolerated a bit of slacking this season which you just would'nt expect from someone with his winning mentality. Either that or the T&A really do have nothing to report.
Report this post »

tyker, midland road says...
1:00pm Sat 17 May 08

contract with noone wanting to take him off our hands

there is of course the route of "by mutual consent"

Daley has form on this front: was it at PRESTON shortly after they sold Ricardo Fuller that Daley left by mutual consent!!

will need to check the Ricardo Fuller bit but certainly DALEY HAS DONE IT BEFORE AND PLEASE MAY HE DO IT AGAIN!
Report this post »

tyker, midland road says...
1:00pm Sat 17 May 08

contract with noone wanting to take him off our hands

there is of course the route of "by mutual consent"

Daley has form on this front: was it at PRESTON shortly after they sold Ricardo Fuller that Daley left by mutual consent!!

will need to check the Ricardo Fuller bit but certainly DALEY HAS DONE IT BEFORE AND PLEASE MAY HE DO IT AGAIN!
Report this post »

tyker, midland road says...
1:00pm Sat 17 May 08

contract with noone wanting to take him off our hands

there is of course the route of "by mutual consent"

Daley has form on this front: was it at PRESTON shortly after they sold Ricardo Fuller that Daley left by mutual consent!!

will need to check the Ricardo Fuller bit but certainly DALEY HAS DONE IT BEFORE AND PLEASE MAY HE DO IT AGAIN!
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
12:44pm Sat 17 May 08

Daley needs to take a leaf out of Beagrie's and Colbeck's book, maybe Darlo might be interested in taking him on loan, both went out and came back better players??? CTID
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
12:44pm Sat 17 May 08

Daley needs to take a leaf out of Beagrie's and Colbeck's book, maybe Darlo might be interested in taking him on loan, both went out and came back better players??? CTID
Report this post »

Darryl, BD2 says...
12:44pm Sat 17 May 08

Daley needs to take a leaf out of Beagrie's and Colbeck's book, maybe Darlo might be interested in taking him on loan, both went out and came back better players??? CTID
Report this post »

Luke, Leeds says...
12:08pm Sat 17 May 08

I'm fairly sure we'll have him next year. 3 year contract with noone wanting to take him off our hands even in America I think we might have him for a while.

Still who knows maybe Stu can motivate him to produce some performances and he could be a good asset... a big MAYBE
Report this post »

Luke, Leeds says...
12:08pm Sat 17 May 08

I'm fairly sure we'll have him next year. 3 year contract with noone wanting to take him off our hands even in America I think we might have him for a while.

Still who knows maybe Stu can motivate him to produce some performances and he could be a good asset... a big MAYBE
Report this post »

Luke, Leeds says...
12:08pm Sat 17 May 08

I'm fairly sure we'll have him next year. 3 year contract with noone wanting to take him off our hands even in America I think we might have him for a while.

Still who knows maybe Stu can motivate him to produce some performances and he could be a good asset... a big MAYBE
Report this post »

tyker, midland road says...
10:53am Sat 17 May 08

its a certainty:providing he can get a visa!
sorry meant to add: over to the experts in international football player expert MR TOPPING:there should be a nice earner on the arrangement fee.
Report this post »

tyker, midland road says...
10:53am Sat 17 May 08

its a certainty:providing he can get a visa!
sorry meant to add: over to the experts in international football player expert MR TOPPING:there should be a nice earner on the arrangement fee.
Report this post »

tyker, midland road says...
10:53am Sat 17 May 08

its a certainty:providing he can get a visa!
sorry meant to add: over to the experts in international football player expert MR TOPPING:there should be a nice earner on the arrangement fee.