The funny thing about this is that I have been thinking the same thing. Right, I for one will not be drawn by idiots on this board anymore. If I choose to ridicule them I will do so in my own way, in my own time, but direct responses to these little girls will now be a thing of the past. All on a level again now Waynus, back to being a poster with a point rather than a pointless poster a la Shaun,sensless and their pet, skippy.

The funny thing about this is that I have been thinking the same thing. Right, I for one will not be drawn by idiots on this board anymore. If I choose to ridicule them I will do so in my own way, in my own time, but direct responses to these little girls will now be a thing of the past. All on a level again now Waynus, back to being a poster with a point rather than a pointless poster a la Shaun,sensless and their pet, skippy.

The funny thing about this is that I have been thinking the same thing. Right, I for one will not be drawn by idiots on this board anymore. If I choose to ridicule them I will do so in my own way, in my own time, but direct responses to these little girls will now be a thing of the past. All on a level again now Waynus, back to being a poster with a point rather than a pointless poster a la Shaun,sensless and their pet, skippy.

Gentleman Jim wrote:
<b>

Waynus wrote:
<b>

Gentleman Jim wrote:
&lt;b&gt; Where did I say I wanted a fight? I never mentioned the word. It would be whipped off the site straight away with a direct threat of violence. And as Senseless knows you are allowed to say anything in the name of free speech and even allude to something as long as it is ambiguous enough and not a direct attack on an individual or group. Mine was simply an offer to meet for a pint and a discussion, and a short walk in the park afterwards. I wouldn't offer to fight any female so Senselass is safe, maybe a Backgammon match or even a couple of boards of Scrabble, but I ain't never hit a woman and don't intend to start with this pathetic creature. &lt;/b&gt;

Fair point, you didn't actually say you wanted a fight, but you certainly insinuated it.

we could take our discussion into Myrtle Park and thrash it out good and proper. Accept and I will certainly turn up so you can enlighten me on your viewpoint and I can unburden mine upon you. That is a good offer. It really is free and you don't need to buy anything, well not before we meet. but nothing that would last overly long or cause too much noise. One is usually enough for someone to have a different viewpoint, even if it is looking up from a sitting position.

If the above wasn't a 'hidden' threat, I don't know what is.

Keep it clean and if you can't, I suggest you simply ignore him. It isn't worth lowering yourself to his level, even if you do 'hide it'. </b>

I can't see how it is any problem of yours, but direct questions asking for direct answers from sensless don't seem to work. why doesn't anyone try 'hiding' it, as Waynus describes it. Veiled is the term usually used if it is a threat but the offer of a pint and a walk to thrash out our differences could be described as neither. </b>

You seem to have a thing about me Gentleman Jim. I don't know what it is or how I seem to offended you. I have just been reading all your recent posts directed to me or about me and none could be seen as positive. In fact, if I said it had rained on Saturday, the way you are at the moment, you would disagree and say it was beautiful. What is our problem?

The reason I asked you not to resort to those levels (hidden or not) is that I respect most of your posts and wouldn't like to see you driven to the levels of 'Sensible' and his cronies.

It would be a shame if your posts were reported and you were booted off this website, whilst the scum get to stay on.

As I said previously, ignore tem rather than offering to meet them and 'thrash' it out. You are better than that. You are clearly an intelligent person, so think of another way of shutting them up.

Gentleman Jim wrote:
<b>

Waynus wrote:
<b>

Gentleman Jim wrote:
&lt;b&gt; Where did I say I wanted a fight? I never mentioned the word. It would be whipped off the site straight away with a direct threat of violence. And as Senseless knows you are allowed to say anything in the name of free speech and even allude to something as long as it is ambiguous enough and not a direct attack on an individual or group. Mine was simply an offer to meet for a pint and a discussion, and a short walk in the park afterwards. I wouldn't offer to fight any female so Senselass is safe, maybe a Backgammon match or even a couple of boards of Scrabble, but I ain't never hit a woman and don't intend to start with this pathetic creature. &lt;/b&gt;

Fair point, you didn't actually say you wanted a fight, but you certainly insinuated it.

we could take our discussion into Myrtle Park and thrash it out good and proper. Accept and I will certainly turn up so you can enlighten me on your viewpoint and I can unburden mine upon you. That is a good offer. It really is free and you don't need to buy anything, well not before we meet. but nothing that would last overly long or cause too much noise. One is usually enough for someone to have a different viewpoint, even if it is looking up from a sitting position.

If the above wasn't a 'hidden' threat, I don't know what is.

Keep it clean and if you can't, I suggest you simply ignore him. It isn't worth lowering yourself to his level, even if you do 'hide it'. </b>

I can't see how it is any problem of yours, but direct questions asking for direct answers from sensless don't seem to work. why doesn't anyone try 'hiding' it, as Waynus describes it. Veiled is the term usually used if it is a threat but the offer of a pint and a walk to thrash out our differences could be described as neither. </b>

You seem to have a thing about me Gentleman Jim. I don't know what it is or how I seem to offended you. I have just been reading all your recent posts directed to me or about me and none could be seen as positive. In fact, if I said it had rained on Saturday, the way you are at the moment, you would disagree and say it was beautiful. What is our problem?

The reason I asked you not to resort to those levels (hidden or not) is that I respect most of your posts and wouldn't like to see you driven to the levels of 'Sensible' and his cronies.

It would be a shame if your posts were reported and you were booted off this website, whilst the scum get to stay on.

As I said previously, ignore tem rather than offering to meet them and 'thrash' it out. You are better than that. You are clearly an intelligent person, so think of another way of shutting them up.

Gentleman Jim wrote:
<b>

Waynus wrote:
<b>

Gentleman Jim wrote:
&lt;b&gt; Where did I say I wanted a fight? I never mentioned the word. It would be whipped off the site straight away with a direct threat of violence. And as Senseless knows you are allowed to say anything in the name of free speech and even allude to something as long as it is ambiguous enough and not a direct attack on an individual or group. Mine was simply an offer to meet for a pint and a discussion, and a short walk in the park afterwards. I wouldn't offer to fight any female so Senselass is safe, maybe a Backgammon match or even a couple of boards of Scrabble, but I ain't never hit a woman and don't intend to start with this pathetic creature. &lt;/b&gt;

Fair point, you didn't actually say you wanted a fight, but you certainly insinuated it.

we could take our discussion into Myrtle Park and thrash it out good and proper. Accept and I will certainly turn up so you can enlighten me on your viewpoint and I can unburden mine upon you. That is a good offer. It really is free and you don't need to buy anything, well not before we meet. but nothing that would last overly long or cause too much noise. One is usually enough for someone to have a different viewpoint, even if it is looking up from a sitting position.

If the above wasn't a 'hidden' threat, I don't know what is.

Keep it clean and if you can't, I suggest you simply ignore him. It isn't worth lowering yourself to his level, even if you do 'hide it'. </b>

I can't see how it is any problem of yours, but direct questions asking for direct answers from sensless don't seem to work. why doesn't anyone try 'hiding' it, as Waynus describes it. Veiled is the term usually used if it is a threat but the offer of a pint and a walk to thrash out our differences could be described as neither. </b>

You seem to have a thing about me Gentleman Jim. I don't know what it is or how I seem to offended you. I have just been reading all your recent posts directed to me or about me and none could be seen as positive. In fact, if I said it had rained on Saturday, the way you are at the moment, you would disagree and say it was beautiful. What is our problem?

The reason I asked you not to resort to those levels (hidden or not) is that I respect most of your posts and wouldn't like to see you driven to the levels of 'Sensible' and his cronies.

It would be a shame if your posts were reported and you were booted off this website, whilst the scum get to stay on.

As I said previously, ignore tem rather than offering to meet them and 'thrash' it out. You are better than that. You are clearly an intelligent person, so think of another way of shutting them up.

Waynus wrote:
<b>

Gentleman Jim wrote:
<b> Where did I say I wanted a fight? I never mentioned the word. It would be whipped off the site straight away with a direct threat of violence. And as Senseless knows you are allowed to say anything in the name of free speech and even allude to something as long as it is ambiguous enough and not a direct attack on an individual or group. Mine was simply an offer to meet for a pint and a discussion, and a short walk in the park afterwards. I wouldn't offer to fight any female so Senselass is safe, maybe a Backgammon match or even a couple of boards of Scrabble, but I ain't never hit a woman and don't intend to start with this pathetic creature. </b>

Fair point, you didn't actually say you wanted a fight, but you certainly insinuated it.

we could take our discussion into Myrtle Park and thrash it out good and proper. Accept and I will certainly turn up so you can enlighten me on your viewpoint and I can unburden mine upon you. That is a good offer. It really is free and you don't need to buy anything, well not before we meet. but nothing that would last overly long or cause too much noise. One is usually enough for someone to have a different viewpoint, even if it is looking up from a sitting position.

If the above wasn't a 'hidden' threat, I don't know what is.

Keep it clean and if you can't, I suggest you simply ignore him. It isn't worth lowering yourself to his level, even if you do 'hide it'. </b>

I can't see how it is any problem of yours, but direct questions asking for direct answers from sensless don't seem to work. why doesn't anyone try 'hiding' it, as Waynus describes it. Veiled is the term usually used if it is a threat but the offer of a pint and a walk to thrash out our differences could be described as neither.

Waynus wrote:
<b>

Gentleman Jim wrote:
<b> Where did I say I wanted a fight? I never mentioned the word. It would be whipped off the site straight away with a direct threat of violence. And as Senseless knows you are allowed to say anything in the name of free speech and even allude to something as long as it is ambiguous enough and not a direct attack on an individual or group. Mine was simply an offer to meet for a pint and a discussion, and a short walk in the park afterwards. I wouldn't offer to fight any female so Senselass is safe, maybe a Backgammon match or even a couple of boards of Scrabble, but I ain't never hit a woman and don't intend to start with this pathetic creature. </b>

Fair point, you didn't actually say you wanted a fight, but you certainly insinuated it.

we could take our discussion into Myrtle Park and thrash it out good and proper. Accept and I will certainly turn up so you can enlighten me on your viewpoint and I can unburden mine upon you. That is a good offer. It really is free and you don't need to buy anything, well not before we meet. but nothing that would last overly long or cause too much noise. One is usually enough for someone to have a different viewpoint, even if it is looking up from a sitting position.

If the above wasn't a 'hidden' threat, I don't know what is.

Keep it clean and if you can't, I suggest you simply ignore him. It isn't worth lowering yourself to his level, even if you do 'hide it'. </b>

I can't see how it is any problem of yours, but direct questions asking for direct answers from sensless don't seem to work. why doesn't anyone try 'hiding' it, as Waynus describes it. Veiled is the term usually used if it is a threat but the offer of a pint and a walk to thrash out our differences could be described as neither.

Waynus wrote:
<b>

Gentleman Jim wrote:
<b> Where did I say I wanted a fight? I never mentioned the word. It would be whipped off the site straight away with a direct threat of violence. And as Senseless knows you are allowed to say anything in the name of free speech and even allude to something as long as it is ambiguous enough and not a direct attack on an individual or group. Mine was simply an offer to meet for a pint and a discussion, and a short walk in the park afterwards. I wouldn't offer to fight any female so Senselass is safe, maybe a Backgammon match or even a couple of boards of Scrabble, but I ain't never hit a woman and don't intend to start with this pathetic creature. </b>

Fair point, you didn't actually say you wanted a fight, but you certainly insinuated it.

we could take our discussion into Myrtle Park and thrash it out good and proper. Accept and I will certainly turn up so you can enlighten me on your viewpoint and I can unburden mine upon you. That is a good offer. It really is free and you don't need to buy anything, well not before we meet. but nothing that would last overly long or cause too much noise. One is usually enough for someone to have a different viewpoint, even if it is looking up from a sitting position.

If the above wasn't a 'hidden' threat, I don't know what is.

Keep it clean and if you can't, I suggest you simply ignore him. It isn't worth lowering yourself to his level, even if you do 'hide it'. </b>

I can't see how it is any problem of yours, but direct questions asking for direct answers from sensless don't seem to work. why doesn't anyone try 'hiding' it, as Waynus describes it. Veiled is the term usually used if it is a threat but the offer of a pint and a walk to thrash out our differences could be described as neither.

Thank you Mr Baldwin. That is all I wanted to do, was bring attention to the quality of the service provided by the stewards the club hire, what I have experienced on a couple of occasions, but more often, what I have witnessed. If I know they have a job to do, and if I see them get a little lets say heavy handed to people that ARE causing trouble I have no qualms at all. But in general as you can see on here from other people making comments, they do have a reputation amongst City supporters and from outside from away from Valley Parade. I am glad you are investigating this and I do hope something positive will come of this and will improve people's experience at Valley Parade, for both home and away supporters. Sorry for my late response to yours as I am rarely online on an evening and never in during the day.

Regards to other posters, I can not understand the aggression towards people like Shaun and Mr Sensible. I just cant understand why some people got so uptight with me bringing this into the open about the levels at which we, I mean by the people do go to matches, past present or future in to be treated fairer and better. I guess the only people that would moan at that are the actual stewards, who else would get so aggresive to me for pointing out something that needed addressing for the betterment of Bradford City and in general the way supporters are treated. And for the last time, I did go by the correct channels originally by contacted the club, but to no avail. So I had no option to bring this into the public, and that is what I shall do, and if anyone else has an ounce of self respect, they will no longer put up with this oppresion.

Thank you Mr Baldwin. That is all I wanted to do, was bring attention to the quality of the service provided by the stewards the club hire, what I have experienced on a couple of occasions, but more often, what I have witnessed. If I know they have a job to do, and if I see them get a little lets say heavy handed to people that ARE causing trouble I have no qualms at all. But in general as you can see on here from other people making comments, they do have a reputation amongst City supporters and from outside from away from Valley Parade. I am glad you are investigating this and I do hope something positive will come of this and will improve people's experience at Valley Parade, for both home and away supporters. Sorry for my late response to yours as I am rarely online on an evening and never in during the day.

Regards to other posters, I can not understand the aggression towards people like Shaun and Mr Sensible. I just cant understand why some people got so uptight with me bringing this into the open about the levels at which we, I mean by the people do go to matches, past present or future in to be treated fairer and better. I guess the only people that would moan at that are the actual stewards, who else would get so aggresive to me for pointing out something that needed addressing for the betterment of Bradford City and in general the way supporters are treated. And for the last time, I did go by the correct channels originally by contacted the club, but to no avail. So I had no option to bring this into the public, and that is what I shall do, and if anyone else has an ounce of self respect, they will no longer put up with this oppresion.

Thank you Mr Baldwin. That is all I wanted to do, was bring attention to the quality of the service provided by the stewards the club hire, what I have experienced on a couple of occasions, but more often, what I have witnessed. If I know they have a job to do, and if I see them get a little lets say heavy handed to people that ARE causing trouble I have no qualms at all. But in general as you can see on here from other people making comments, they do have a reputation amongst City supporters and from outside from away from Valley Parade. I am glad you are investigating this and I do hope something positive will come of this and will improve people's experience at Valley Parade, for both home and away supporters. Sorry for my late response to yours as I am rarely online on an evening and never in during the day.

Regards to other posters, I can not understand the aggression towards people like Shaun and Mr Sensible. I just cant understand why some people got so uptight with me bringing this into the open about the levels at which we, I mean by the people do go to matches, past present or future in to be treated fairer and better. I guess the only people that would moan at that are the actual stewards, who else would get so aggresive to me for pointing out something that needed addressing for the betterment of Bradford City and in general the way supporters are treated. And for the last time, I did go by the correct channels originally by contacted the club, but to no avail. So I had no option to bring this into the public, and that is what I shall do, and if anyone else has an ounce of self respect, they will no longer put up with this oppresion.

Direct questions have been put to sensible, shaun, skippy and anyone who has questioned the running of BCFC, but none have come back with any answers? The operations manager? David Baldwin has even offered his services to the disgruntled few, and NONE of have had the decency to contact him. How many football club officials have joined in on pages like these and offered solutions to peoples gripes.... ? That is awesome work Mr Baldwin. I reckon you won't be hearing from the people involved though. They wouldn't listen to what you say anyway.... proven on here.

Direct questions have been put to sensible, shaun, skippy and anyone who has questioned the running of BCFC, but none have come back with any answers? The operations manager? David Baldwin has even offered his services to the disgruntled few, and NONE of have had the decency to contact him. How many football club officials have joined in on pages like these and offered solutions to peoples gripes.... ? That is awesome work Mr Baldwin. I reckon you won't be hearing from the people involved though. They wouldn't listen to what you say anyway.... proven on here.

Direct questions have been put to sensible, shaun, skippy and anyone who has questioned the running of BCFC, but none have come back with any answers? The operations manager? David Baldwin has even offered his services to the disgruntled few, and NONE of have had the decency to contact him. How many football club officials have joined in on pages like these and offered solutions to peoples gripes.... ? That is awesome work Mr Baldwin. I reckon you won't be hearing from the people involved though. They wouldn't listen to what you say anyway.... proven on here.

skippy wrote:

Henley B wrote:

SHAUN wrote:

Reckless wrote: Okay, that's enough...... I've had some fun and decent debate with the majority of true BCFC fans on here, however the minority use these threads for their own agenda and ruin it for everyone else. They were probably bullied at school - deservedly so. WJ even had a go about the stewards on the Junior Witter comment board the other day - PATHETIC! Get a grip of yourself you cry baby. As for Sensible? Who gives a ****? Not me, yer not welcome anyway. Shaun? Grow up. So it's now goodbye - I'll no longer be adding my support to City this way, I'll stay with the official site. I'll be joining the true fans on here over the Christmas period, in person at Fortress Valley Parade, save me a seat someone? UP THE BANTAMS :-)

You wont be missed!!!!

Shaun why are you still here? Can you not read as well as spell? Surely you can see everyone hates you. The other day you nearly gained some respect by admitting to buying a season ticket but there you go being a prat again.

fortress vp what are you on and what gives you the right to call people names,shauns a decent hard working family man,just because he speaks the truth doesnt make him a prat on the contrary its quite possible you are the prat.

I didn't put Fortress Skip, that was someone else? Read it! Are you illiterate as well?

As for these 'threads' .... I've been reading and not joining in for weeks, and find that the majority of what is put on here by Shaun, Sensible, and sometime YOU, is completely unfounded b0ll0cks. YOUR personal vendetta against Wayne Jacobs? Is he not a decent family man? YES he is. Shauns comment - YOU WON'T BE MISSED..... towards reckless is a personal attack, not constructive, .... decent family man? Doesn't show his decency by placing garbage on these threads like you do... Like I said I didn't' put Fortress, that was reckless, but it's a comment that a true fan would put, tongue in cheek? If reckless has decided not to comment anymore due to the likes of YOU and the rest of the idiots on here giving none constructive comments and abusing the club and people like Wayne Jacobs, I can't blame him. You and yer mates are not welcome, now who's the prat here? You? Shaun? Who? I suggest you read the comment and who they are from before attacking me. You are not clever enough to win any argument on here. You have nothing constructive to say and don't answer the questions put to you.

skippy wrote:

Henley B wrote:

SHAUN wrote:

Reckless wrote: Okay, that's enough...... I've had some fun and decent debate with the majority of true BCFC fans on here, however the minority use these threads for their own agenda and ruin it for everyone else. They were probably bullied at school - deservedly so. WJ even had a go about the stewards on the Junior Witter comment board the other day - PATHETIC! Get a grip of yourself you cry baby. As for Sensible? Who gives a ****? Not me, yer not welcome anyway. Shaun? Grow up. So it's now goodbye - I'll no longer be adding my support to City this way, I'll stay with the official site. I'll be joining the true fans on here over the Christmas period, in person at Fortress Valley Parade, save me a seat someone? UP THE BANTAMS :-)

You wont be missed!!!!

Shaun why are you still here? Can you not read as well as spell? Surely you can see everyone hates you. The other day you nearly gained some respect by admitting to buying a season ticket but there you go being a prat again.

fortress vp what are you on and what gives you the right to call people names,shauns a decent hard working family man,just because he speaks the truth doesnt make him a prat on the contrary its quite possible you are the prat.

I didn't put Fortress Skip, that was someone else? Read it! Are you illiterate as well?

As for these 'threads' .... I've been reading and not joining in for weeks, and find that the majority of what is put on here by Shaun, Sensible, and sometime YOU, is completely unfounded b0ll0cks. YOUR personal vendetta against Wayne Jacobs? Is he not a decent family man? YES he is. Shauns comment - YOU WON'T BE MISSED..... towards reckless is a personal attack, not constructive, .... decent family man? Doesn't show his decency by placing garbage on these threads like you do... Like I said I didn't' put Fortress, that was reckless, but it's a comment that a true fan would put, tongue in cheek? If reckless has decided not to comment anymore due to the likes of YOU and the rest of the idiots on here giving none constructive comments and abusing the club and people like Wayne Jacobs, I can't blame him. You and yer mates are not welcome, now who's the prat here? You? Shaun? Who? I suggest you read the comment and who they are from before attacking me. You are not clever enough to win any argument on here. You have nothing constructive to say and don't answer the questions put to you.

skippy wrote:

Henley B wrote:

SHAUN wrote:

Reckless wrote: Okay, that's enough...... I've had some fun and decent debate with the majority of true BCFC fans on here, however the minority use these threads for their own agenda and ruin it for everyone else. They were probably bullied at school - deservedly so. WJ even had a go about the stewards on the Junior Witter comment board the other day - PATHETIC! Get a grip of yourself you cry baby. As for Sensible? Who gives a ****? Not me, yer not welcome anyway. Shaun? Grow up. So it's now goodbye - I'll no longer be adding my support to City this way, I'll stay with the official site. I'll be joining the true fans on here over the Christmas period, in person at Fortress Valley Parade, save me a seat someone? UP THE BANTAMS :-)

You wont be missed!!!!

Shaun why are you still here? Can you not read as well as spell? Surely you can see everyone hates you. The other day you nearly gained some respect by admitting to buying a season ticket but there you go being a prat again.

fortress vp what are you on and what gives you the right to call people names,shauns a decent hard working family man,just because he speaks the truth doesnt make him a prat on the contrary its quite possible you are the prat.

I didn't put Fortress Skip, that was someone else? Read it! Are you illiterate as well?

As for these 'threads' .... I've been reading and not joining in for weeks, and find that the majority of what is put on here by Shaun, Sensible, and sometime YOU, is completely unfounded b0ll0cks. YOUR personal vendetta against Wayne Jacobs? Is he not a decent family man? YES he is. Shauns comment - YOU WON'T BE MISSED..... towards reckless is a personal attack, not constructive, .... decent family man? Doesn't show his decency by placing garbage on these threads like you do... Like I said I didn't' put Fortress, that was reckless, but it's a comment that a true fan would put, tongue in cheek? If reckless has decided not to comment anymore due to the likes of YOU and the rest of the idiots on here giving none constructive comments and abusing the club and people like Wayne Jacobs, I can't blame him. You and yer mates are not welcome, now who's the prat here? You? Shaun? Who? I suggest you read the comment and who they are from before attacking me. You are not clever enough to win any argument on here. You have nothing constructive to say and don't answer the questions put to you.

Gentleman Jim wrote:
<b> Where did I say I wanted a fight? I never mentioned the word. It would be whipped off the site straight away with a direct threat of violence. And as Senseless knows you are allowed to say anything in the name of free speech and even allude to something as long as it is ambiguous enough and not a direct attack on an individual or group. Mine was simply an offer to meet for a pint and a discussion, and a short walk in the park afterwards. I wouldn't offer to fight any female so Senselass is safe, maybe a Backgammon match or even a couple of boards of Scrabble, but I ain't never hit a woman and don't intend to start with this pathetic creature. </b>

Fair point, you didn't actually say you wanted a fight, but you certainly insinuated it.

we could take our discussion into Myrtle Park and thrash it out good and proper. Accept and I will certainly turn up so you can enlighten me on your viewpoint and I can unburden mine upon you. That is a good offer. It really is free and you don't need to buy anything, well not before we meet. but nothing that would last overly long or cause too much noise. One is usually enough for someone to have a different viewpoint, even if it is looking up from a sitting position.

If the above wasn't a 'hidden' threat, I don't know what is.

Keep it clean and if you can't, I suggest you simply ignore him. It isn't worth lowering yourself to his level, even if you do 'hide it'.

Gentleman Jim wrote:
<b> Where did I say I wanted a fight? I never mentioned the word. It would be whipped off the site straight away with a direct threat of violence. And as Senseless knows you are allowed to say anything in the name of free speech and even allude to something as long as it is ambiguous enough and not a direct attack on an individual or group. Mine was simply an offer to meet for a pint and a discussion, and a short walk in the park afterwards. I wouldn't offer to fight any female so Senselass is safe, maybe a Backgammon match or even a couple of boards of Scrabble, but I ain't never hit a woman and don't intend to start with this pathetic creature. </b>

Fair point, you didn't actually say you wanted a fight, but you certainly insinuated it.

we could take our discussion into Myrtle Park and thrash it out good and proper. Accept and I will certainly turn up so you can enlighten me on your viewpoint and I can unburden mine upon you. That is a good offer. It really is free and you don't need to buy anything, well not before we meet. but nothing that would last overly long or cause too much noise. One is usually enough for someone to have a different viewpoint, even if it is looking up from a sitting position.

If the above wasn't a 'hidden' threat, I don't know what is.

Keep it clean and if you can't, I suggest you simply ignore him. It isn't worth lowering yourself to his level, even if you do 'hide it'.

Gentleman Jim wrote:
<b> Where did I say I wanted a fight? I never mentioned the word. It would be whipped off the site straight away with a direct threat of violence. And as Senseless knows you are allowed to say anything in the name of free speech and even allude to something as long as it is ambiguous enough and not a direct attack on an individual or group. Mine was simply an offer to meet for a pint and a discussion, and a short walk in the park afterwards. I wouldn't offer to fight any female so Senselass is safe, maybe a Backgammon match or even a couple of boards of Scrabble, but I ain't never hit a woman and don't intend to start with this pathetic creature. </b>

Fair point, you didn't actually say you wanted a fight, but you certainly insinuated it.

we could take our discussion into Myrtle Park and thrash it out good and proper. Accept and I will certainly turn up so you can enlighten me on your viewpoint and I can unburden mine upon you. That is a good offer. It really is free and you don't need to buy anything, well not before we meet. but nothing that would last overly long or cause too much noise. One is usually enough for someone to have a different viewpoint, even if it is looking up from a sitting position.

If the above wasn't a 'hidden' threat, I don't know what is.

Keep it clean and if you can't, I suggest you simply ignore him. It isn't worth lowering yourself to his level, even if you do 'hide it'.

Henley B wrote:

SHAUN wrote:

Reckless wrote: Okay, that's enough...... I've had some fun and decent debate with the majority of true BCFC fans on here, however the minority use these threads for their own agenda and ruin it for everyone else. They were probably bullied at school - deservedly so. WJ even had a go about the stewards on the Junior Witter comment board the other day - PATHETIC! Get a grip of yourself you cry baby. As for Sensible? Who gives a ****? Not me, yer not welcome anyway. Shaun? Grow up. So it's now goodbye - I'll no longer be adding my support to City this way, I'll stay with the official site. I'll be joining the true fans on here over the Christmas period, in person at Fortress Valley Parade, save me a seat someone? UP THE BANTAMS :-)

You wont be missed!!!!

Shaun why are you still here? Can you not read as well as spell? Surely you can see everyone hates you. The other day you nearly gained some respect by admitting to buying a season ticket but there you go being a prat again.

fortress vp what are you on and what gives you the right to call people names,shauns a decent hard working family man,just because he speaks the truth doesnt make him a prat on the contrary its quite possible you are the prat.

Henley B wrote:

SHAUN wrote:

Reckless wrote: Okay, that's enough...... I've had some fun and decent debate with the majority of true BCFC fans on here, however the minority use these threads for their own agenda and ruin it for everyone else. They were probably bullied at school - deservedly so. WJ even had a go about the stewards on the Junior Witter comment board the other day - PATHETIC! Get a grip of yourself you cry baby. As for Sensible? Who gives a ****? Not me, yer not welcome anyway. Shaun? Grow up. So it's now goodbye - I'll no longer be adding my support to City this way, I'll stay with the official site. I'll be joining the true fans on here over the Christmas period, in person at Fortress Valley Parade, save me a seat someone? UP THE BANTAMS :-)

You wont be missed!!!!

Shaun why are you still here? Can you not read as well as spell? Surely you can see everyone hates you. The other day you nearly gained some respect by admitting to buying a season ticket but there you go being a prat again.

fortress vp what are you on and what gives you the right to call people names,shauns a decent hard working family man,just because he speaks the truth doesnt make him a prat on the contrary its quite possible you are the prat.

Henley B wrote:

SHAUN wrote:

Reckless wrote: Okay, that's enough...... I've had some fun and decent debate with the majority of true BCFC fans on here, however the minority use these threads for their own agenda and ruin it for everyone else. They were probably bullied at school - deservedly so. WJ even had a go about the stewards on the Junior Witter comment board the other day - PATHETIC! Get a grip of yourself you cry baby. As for Sensible? Who gives a ****? Not me, yer not welcome anyway. Shaun? Grow up. So it's now goodbye - I'll no longer be adding my support to City this way, I'll stay with the official site. I'll be joining the true fans on here over the Christmas period, in person at Fortress Valley Parade, save me a seat someone? UP THE BANTAMS :-)

You wont be missed!!!!

Shaun why are you still here? Can you not read as well as spell? Surely you can see everyone hates you. The other day you nearly gained some respect by admitting to buying a season ticket but there you go being a prat again.

fortress vp what are you on and what gives you the right to call people names,shauns a decent hard working family man,just because he speaks the truth doesnt make him a prat on the contrary its quite possible you are the prat.

SHAUN wrote:

Reckless wrote:
Okay, that's enough...... I've had some fun and decent debate with the majority of true BCFC fans on here, however the minority use these threads for their own agenda and ruin it for everyone else. They were probably bullied at school - deservedly so. WJ even had a go about the stewards on the Junior Witter comment board the other day - PATHETIC! Get a grip of yourself you cry baby. As for Sensible? Who gives a ****? Not me, yer not welcome anyway. Shaun? Grow up. So it's now goodbye - I'll no longer be adding my support to City this way, I'll stay with the official site. I'll be joining the true fans on here over the Christmas period, in person at Fortress Valley Parade, save me a seat someone? UP THE BANTAMS :-)

You wont be missed!!!!

Shaun why are you still here? Can you not read as well as spell? Surely you can see everyone hates you. The other day you nearly gained some respect by admitting to buying a season ticket but there you go being a prat again.

SHAUN wrote:

Reckless wrote:
Okay, that's enough...... I've had some fun and decent debate with the majority of true BCFC fans on here, however the minority use these threads for their own agenda and ruin it for everyone else. They were probably bullied at school - deservedly so. WJ even had a go about the stewards on the Junior Witter comment board the other day - PATHETIC! Get a grip of yourself you cry baby. As for Sensible? Who gives a ****? Not me, yer not welcome anyway. Shaun? Grow up. So it's now goodbye - I'll no longer be adding my support to City this way, I'll stay with the official site. I'll be joining the true fans on here over the Christmas period, in person at Fortress Valley Parade, save me a seat someone? UP THE BANTAMS :-)

You wont be missed!!!!

Shaun why are you still here? Can you not read as well as spell? Surely you can see everyone hates you. The other day you nearly gained some respect by admitting to buying a season ticket but there you go being a prat again.

SHAUN wrote:

Reckless wrote:
Okay, that's enough...... I've had some fun and decent debate with the majority of true BCFC fans on here, however the minority use these threads for their own agenda and ruin it for everyone else. They were probably bullied at school - deservedly so. WJ even had a go about the stewards on the Junior Witter comment board the other day - PATHETIC! Get a grip of yourself you cry baby. As for Sensible? Who gives a ****? Not me, yer not welcome anyway. Shaun? Grow up. So it's now goodbye - I'll no longer be adding my support to City this way, I'll stay with the official site. I'll be joining the true fans on here over the Christmas period, in person at Fortress Valley Parade, save me a seat someone? UP THE BANTAMS :-)

You wont be missed!!!!

Shaun why are you still here? Can you not read as well as spell? Surely you can see everyone hates you. The other day you nearly gained some respect by admitting to buying a season ticket but there you go being a prat again.

Gentleman Jim wrote:
Where did I say I wanted a fight? I never mentioned the word. It would be whipped off the site straight away with a direct threat of violence. And as Senseless knows you are allowed to say anything in the name of free speech and even allude to something as long as it is ambiguous enough and not a direct attack on an individual or group. Mine was simply an offer to meet for a pint and a discussion, and a short walk in the park afterwards. I wouldn't offer to fight any female so Senselass is safe, maybe a Backgammon match or even a couple of boards of Scrabble, but I ain't never hit a woman and don't intend to start with this pathetic creature.

Why the assumption that he is female . . .

Gentleman Jim wrote:
Where did I say I wanted a fight? I never mentioned the word. It would be whipped off the site straight away with a direct threat of violence. And as Senseless knows you are allowed to say anything in the name of free speech and even allude to something as long as it is ambiguous enough and not a direct attack on an individual or group. Mine was simply an offer to meet for a pint and a discussion, and a short walk in the park afterwards. I wouldn't offer to fight any female so Senselass is safe, maybe a Backgammon match or even a couple of boards of Scrabble, but I ain't never hit a woman and don't intend to start with this pathetic creature.

Why the assumption that he is female . . .