THE Government bowed yesterday to pressure to reopen the case of

George Beattie, 20 years after he was convicted of the murder of

Margaret McLaughlin, a young Carluke woman.

Scottish Home Affairs Minister Lord Fraser of Carmyllie has written to

Clydesdale MP Jimmy Hood, Beattie's MP, informing him that the Scottish

Secretary has agreed to refer the case to the Court of Criminal Appeal

to decide whether Beattie has suffered a miscarriage of justice.

The move follows a prolonged campaign to establish Beattie's

innocence. Among those who have played a prominent part are Mr Peter

Hill, former producer of BBC's Rough Justice programme, Beattie's lawyer

Mr Joe Beltrami, Mr Hood, and the late Lanarkshire MP, Dame Judith Hart.

Mr Hill was involved in a Rough Justice programme proclaiming

Beattie's innocence in 1983 and, over the past two years, has written a

series of articles in The Herald's law page, alleging that vital blood

grouping evidence which could have cleared Beattie was suppressed at his

trial.

Mr Hill claims that the authorities have been guilty of a cover-up in

Beattie's case and alleged in an article that a speck of blood found on

Beattie's handkerchief, the only forensic evidence against him, was not

the blood of the victim.

It is likely that the referral to the appeal court will concentrate on

the blood-grouping aspects of the case.

Rough Justice also alleged that the murder had taken place some hours

later than the prosecution alleged, a time for which Beattie had a

cast-iron alibi.

Beattie, then 19, served 13 years after being convicted of the

stabbing of 23-year-old Margaret McLaughlin in Carluke Glen in 1973. A

jury at the High Court in Glasgow took just 35 minutes to convict him by

a majority verdict.

Now 39, Beattie was released in 1986 and was working as a bus driver

in Lanarkshire when he was recalled on licence in April last year after

being accused of kicking his social worker on the leg.

He was admonished on a breach of the peace charge at Lanark Sheriff

Court but is still languishing in Edinburgh's Saughton prison with no

release date, a state of affairs Mr Beltrami describes as a disgrace.

Mr Hood, who has described the police investigation against Beattie as

a disaster from start to finish, said yesterday that although the letter

from Lord Fraser contained just two paragraphs, they were the most

pleasing two paragraphs he had ever read in his life.

''It's fantastic news. I have just spoken to his mother and she is

delighted. She had her son taken from her 20 years ago.

''She is seeing him tomorrow morning and I will let her break the news

to him. It will be the first time in 20 years that she's had any good

news to give him.

''It's been a long campaign but it's like running a marathon and, like

a marathon, you forget all the pain and anguish if you win.''

Beattie's brother, Jim, 49, said: ''We are overjoyed, obviously. We

will have to wait and see what happens now and take it from there. We

don't want to build up our hopes too much and then have them dashed.''

Mr Beltrami said he was delighted with the referral back to the appeal

court but added: ''It's a disgrace that he is still in custody as a

result of a minor breach of the peace for which he was admonished.''

He is also sure that Beattie is not a killer. ''Having met and talked

to him many times, I am convinced that he was incapable of carrying out

this brutal murder.''

Mr Beltrami said evidence of blood grouping was the key to the case

and he was reasonably confident that Beattie's appeal would succeed.

The appeal is expected to be heard in the early part of next year.

There have been a number of referrals to the appeal court by the

Secretary of State in recent years.

One of the best known involved Stoke-on-Trent lorry driver John

Preece, who had served seven years of a life sentence for murder until

the evidence of Home Office forensic scientist Dr Alan Clift was

discredited.