Report this comment
  • "Why does Councillor Heseltine think the roads are too narrow as they are to be widened. If access is not feasible why was this site listed in Bradford Councils RUDP as a development site ?. If Elected Members and the local MP were of the view that it could not be developed the site should have been removed from the Bradford Plan. Lets us face if the site is NOT developed it will just pressure on green belt in the local area. When most other areas have had to accept new housing why should Micklethwaite be an exception. Parts of Riddlesden with lots of housing are accessed via Bar Lane which is a single width swing bridge over the canal !!"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.

  • Enter the above word in the box below

New plan for Micklethwaite homes branded a waste of time and money

Terry Brown

Terry Brown

First published in News

Re-styled plans for an estate near Bingley just submitted to Bradford planners as a new application have been labelled a “waste of time and taxpayers’ money,” by campaigners.

While Bellway and Redrow Homes are locked in a High Court battle with Communities Secretary Eric Pickles over their original plan for the site at Sty Lane, Micklethwaite, they have now put in the tweaked application to be considered in tandem.

The first plan for 440 homes was rejected by Bradford Council, a government planning inspector and Mr Pickles. A major stumbling block was that emergency access relied on a single way into the site via an unpredictable swing bridge across the Leeds-Liverpool Canal.

But while continuing to challenge that rejection, Bellway and Redrow this week have now put forward a new plan where the bridge is replaced with a purpose-built two-lane bridge and electric bollards which are instantly controllable by CCTV.

The alternative access for emergency services to the site would be available via Oakwood Drive at the junction with Lady Lane.

Explaining the system on behalf of Bellway and Redrow, highways consultant Alison France, of Sanderson Associates said: “If the swing bridge is not operational or cannot be reset within three minutes, then Bradford Council’s Urban Traffic Control Unit in the city centre will be able to monitor that on CCTV and lower the electric bollards at Oakwood Drive to give access.

“It would be more or less instantaneous,” she said.

But after studying the new application, Terry Brown, chairman of the Greenhill Action Group said it seemed a potentially pointless exercise which could waste Bradford Council’s time and taxpayers’ cash.

“From what I can see, there is an outline application for a two-lane bridge with very little detail and the big change is the bollards and emergency access to try and satisfy the Secretary of State’s concerns regarding the first application,” Mr Brown said.

“What confuses me is how can the council accept an application when there is an appeal outstanding.

“At a stroke, the High Court judge could find against the Secretary of State and then the whole thing could be up in the air again.

“We could be back to square one on that application. Meantime the Council will have wasted time and local taxpayers’ money on dealing with this so-called new application.”

Bingley ward Conservative Councillor David Heseltine also believes the new application is an unnecessary diversion.

“They cannot get away from the fact the roads involved in this site are just too narrow,” he said.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree